Dr. Jordan Peterson | PRETTY INTENSE PODCAST | Clips 04 |Ep. 104

Check out our other videos:
Dr. Robert J. Gilbert | FULL VIDEO PODCAST
Michael Beckwith | PRETTY INTENSE PODCAST
Billy Carson | FULL VIDEO PODCAST

Today on the show is someone that we are so excited about. We have been listening to his talks, and his information for so long. His name is Dr. Jordan Peterson. He is a professor of psychology, clinical psychologist and author of best selling books "12 Rules For Life - An Antidote To Chaos" and now he has "Beyond Order -12 More Rules For Life". So clearly we need a lot of rules for life, because life is really challenging. And that’s a lot of what we talked about. Just how hard it is, how complicated it is. Then we get into self-awareness. It is so important to become self-aware. Facing our strengths and weaknesses, honestly and without judgement. We all want be better people, but it’s a matter of how do we figure out where we need to get better. Dr Peterson is a fascinating human. if you’ve never heard of him, get ready, he’s a straight down the barrel kind of guy and we think you’re gonna like this one. Enjoy.

====

Jordan B. Peterson has taught mythology to lawyers, doctors and business people, consulted for the UN Secretary-General, helped his clinical clients manage depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, anxiety, and schizophrenia, served as an adviser to senior partners of major Canadian law firms, and lectured extensively in North America and Europe. With his students and colleagues at Harvard and the University of Toronto, Dr. Peterson has published over a hundred scientific papers, transforming the modern understanding of personality, while his book Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief revolutionized the psychology of religion. His book 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos was published in 2018 and has sold over 4 million copies internationally. The sequel, Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life, was released on March 2, 2021.

Twitter: @jordanbpeterson

Subscribe to our channel:

[rickhutch]

I love Dr Jordan Peterson, Jordan “the Truth “ Peterson

[JONSEY]

What a beautiful smart woman!
I love Jordan Peterson too as he tells things as they are, doesn't beat around the bush!

[scottjackson]

Danica Patrick knocks me out on every level.

[GrowthMindsetChannel]

“Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not to who someone else is today.” ~ Jordan Peterson 💪🏻🚀

[prosphorus]

Shes very expressive, a wonderful trait

[no-bozos]

He nailed Patrick's personality. Most high end athletes are somewhat disagreeable and for two reasons. One is because they are naturally competitive, and two because people have preconceived notions about how they should act. In the second charge "ordinary" people feel like someone so gifted should be humble and grateful for their gift. So anything the athlete says is always scrutinized through that lens.

[ericm.]

Personality tests are helpful to understand oneself but they have limited applicability as time passes. My values and opinions on a wide range of things have changed over time to the point where I cannot fully relate to the person I was 20 years ago. While the structure of these types of tests can remain valid indefinitely, the information we glean from the results normally has an expiration date; how much depends on the amount of new experiences we acquire over time. The more we expose ourselves to new truths, the bigger, more complicated, and more nuanced our world and value system become.
In short, I think we should definitely make use of different personality tests but we should make sure to retake them every couple of years or so.

[demosthenescotto]

Hello Danica,
I've been a fan of Danica Patrick for many years.
Through your many transitions in motorsports, I proudly remained a fan.
Not because of your driving abilities but because you remained true to yourself to "Danica".
You never desired to be the best race car driver.
Your desire was to compete dispite hearing the word "No".
Are you perfect?
No, you are human
Keep moving forward.
I enjoy your podcast.
Good luck to you Danica.
Bring that Danica something to your podcast table like you brought that Danica something to the motorsports table.
Intelligence, curiosity, partisapation and the completion of goals.
Congratulations to you "D"

D. Cotto.

[maryt]

I would love to here more about the subject of Brainwashing, MIND GAMES! Thank you in advance!!!

[Encryptus]

Tough life for me. I always test in diferent tests 100% conscienciousness and usually between 8-14% extraversion and 4-8% neuroticism. And between 80-96% openness and around 50% aggreableness. Some really extreme features make most people not understand me.

[pjuliano]

Ray of light, a photograph, the way I used to be, some half forgotten stranger, doesn't mean that much to me -Peart

[zalamael]

Agreeableness is not associated with compassion, it is a form of weakness. Agreeableness (at least in my opinion) is the degree to which you will agree with people publicly, while disagreeing privately (in your own head). By being agreeable, you are sidestepping confrontation and compromising your own integrity. For example, suppose you hold political views that are counter to the people around you. If you get asked your opinion on the subject, you have two options.

Be honest, and face the wrath of the group, which requires integrity (standing up for your principles and beliefs) and courage (to stand alone against a hostile crowd because you refuse to back down). Those are qualities that are common in strong/dominant people who have high self esteem (as people with high self esteem don't require validation from the people around them, which leaves them free to say and do whatever they want).

The other option, is to agree with the group, even though you don't privately agree. That is agreeableness, and it requires that you compromise your integrity by lying, because you feared confrontation and allowed that fear to compromise who you are (which is cowardice). These are weak traits that are common in people with low self esteem (because people with low self esteem derive their sense of self worth by gaining esteem from the people around them). That need for positive validation, coupled with the fear of being singled out and 'attacked' (shamed, humiliated, mocked etc) by people who disagree with you, is the driving force behind agreeableness (assuming you define agreeableness as I did above).

I think Jordan is being too nice in his statement on agreeableness, either that or he uses a different definition of the word to the one I use.

EDIT: I just looked it up, and Jordan is using the agreed upon definition by the scientific community. So although what I said was accurate, that is not the correct scientific definition of agreeableness. I will have to see if I can find the correct word that fits my statement.

[thedarkmask]

Please add what this clip is about so I would know why I would want to listen

[cool-as-cucumber]

I felt like most of the things went over her head, JP is firing a machine gun of knowledge

[westofcrestwood]

Wow Danica, I never knew. Maybe Shapiro in the near future.

[danielclermont]

Danica, I have always been a fan, still am.I love nascar.

[hs-gynn]

Danica, I think you are in love with Dr. Peterson.

[TonyHavenMusic]

It's very easy for extroverts to meet other extroverts than introverts to meet like minded introverts I find, I live alone in the nature in my own house and want a relationship, but I only meet extroverts who need cities, very draining from a dating point of view

[amybork]

Some intellectuals are very broken people.

[TonyHavenMusic]

How can extreme end agreeableness be "I'll never let you go" that sounds very disagreeable to me, being agreeable when someone says they want to leave is letting them go