N.T. Wright is N.T. Wrong! New Perspective on Paul Exposed by John MacArthur

preview_player
Показать описание
When someone has a fresh new interpretation after 2000 years you know it ain't gonna be good!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The reformation doesn't know how to interpret Paul, how will they then know how to interpret N.T Write? lol

fernandopaulus
Автор

I believe it is an exaggeration to call false teacher. N.T Wright. One may have some disagreement as Christian. I was listening to a conversation between N.T Wright and James White. It was a delight and a high level of discussion. One may wrestle with his position. However, He made a lot of sense. And by the way, you should not tell people what books to read. I would encourage people to N.T wright and John Piper response on that matter. I believe that will help us to have a right view and a solid position.

MauleyColas
Автор

Have you ever read NT Wright at all? MacArthur, God bless his soul, is a grifter with a lot of stuff like this. Piper and Wright are friends and brothers.

Not one single time have you ever read Wright.

How’s your ministry for the Lord going?

logicaldude
Автор

Tom Wright has forgotten more OT than Most of his critics have ever known. If God requires the most innocent righteous personality to die for the most guilty how in any logic is that rightness? The Reformation theologians have all but destroyed the proper view of God’s manifest love for his people.
If God requires you to forgive without killing an innocent being then just maybe He forgives without killing the most innocent being. The death was necessary but not in the terms most of us have been taught.
N T Wright is right.

denniswilson
Автор

McArther read hundreds of pages of Wright’s books but can’t tell us what Wright believes? I’m not a scholar or a pastor, but I’ve read many books, including a view of Wright’s book and have learned views he holds. So, was McArthur lying? Did he really read his stuff? I would say Wright can confuse people at times due to his way of writing at times. But, McArthur showed great ignorance over what he claimed.

Maybe talk to DA Carson to actually learn what Wright believes.

ProtestantismLeftBehind
Автор

"Ask your book shop keeper person, why are you carrying a book that is not Orthodox" The "cancel culture" is everywhere. Let's ban books that don't agree with our theology. That sounds like a really bad idea my friend!!

bradtroyer
Автор

I'm a new Christian by 2 years, and came across the new paul perspective its impacting my faith. If salvation depends on me I'm going to hell!! Thank you for this giving me hope again.

linkes
Автор

While it is appreciated that an attempt to refute N.T Wright's theology is made. I think there is depth needed to study and refute N.T Wright's theology. N.T Wright rejects imputed / imparted righteousness, redefines justification and redefines the Gospel. He is not teaching against substitutionary atonement. His core issue is to redefine justification.

prashanthsrinivass
Автор

NT WRIGHT is closer to the perspective of the Jewish disciples.

charlemagnealcala
Автор

if you actively admit you are in the category of people mentioned in Jude 1:9‭-‬10‭, ‬16‭, ‬18‭-‬19, and actively fail to live up to Galatians 6:1, and ignore Matthew 18. Just to get some clicks, and to promote your own Media career, whose entire purpose is to promote division in the church born from things you have admitted you don't understand, through casting judgement on those you will not try to talk to, how should we view you? As righteous? Should we view you as better because you have cast dispersion on another? May the Lord rebuke you.

realgregorydyck
Автор

N. T Write is right, the gospel is not about HOW you get saved, it is by WHICH you get saved. English guys, simple English

fernandopaulus
Автор

No! John MacArthur is wrong. Who is he against N.T. Wright as a New Testament, especially Pauline, scholar?

lanbaode
Автор

Which NT Wright's book does MacArthur is quoting from?

amitkohan
Автор

Nt wright is known as nt wrong for good reason.

kkwok
Автор

If God is not-so-angry, why would He have even instituted animal sacrifice? A bloody, messy, costly, ugly butchering of innocent animals?

robertyoshimaru
Автор

To future viewers RUN away, far away from Anybody ^^^^ who claims to be doctrinaire, particularly a "watchdog", Jesus wasn't about doctrine

vomact
Автор

You and John MacArthur go to great lengths to tell us what you believe that NT Wight believes (or not), but nothing whatever on what either of you thinks or believe.

Sanctimonious a bit?

larrybrantley