Understanding and Refuting Oneness Pentecostalism

A historical and biblical analysis of Oneness Pentecostalism

[GigiRocks]

Thank you SO MUCH for your ministry. Please pray that iI would have the boldness to share this with my family one day, as fear has me bound. And please keep being a light and a voice of truth; you are snatching souls from the darkness and bringing them into the truth of God's glorious grace; to God be the glory!
Every blessing to you, your family and those you are setting free from false doctrine. 🙏🏻✝️

[chrismorton]

Thank you Pastor for this very thorough breakdown on this topic. I always enjoy learning from your teachings. May God continue to bless your ministry!!

[AdelaArmstrong-ig]

Blessings Just saw this study now and I’m blessed Thank you for your obedience and your character shows your Love for the Family the body. Thank you for your sacrifice.

[coltonbrewer]

Loved seeing you at NObTS for the cults class. Glad I’m able to catch this one on here. You’re extremely thorough and you break things down so they are easily digestible and easier to remember

[durellteesdale]

Nuff Respect Passt.

Very depthful and useful. We appreciate the content in this show.

Grace and Peace .

[georgettacarvin]

Thanks for this history.
I learned a lot.

[kingdomminded]

Great teaching and incite. Blessings from the UK

[lloydcrooks]

Excellent work much respect from the UK

[terryhatcher]

I’m Pentecostal and we are Trinitarian. Oneness doesn’t own the Pentecostal movement.

[gregorywalker]

Great teaching, bro! Very informative. I'm still waiting on you to debate Gino Jennings. Lol
Gino's teaching are seriously flawed.

[scottpitta]

Your perspective on early Pentecostalism is valid and interesting. Parham, Durham and Seymour are seldom mentioned by Oneness Pentecostals. Others such as Madison Tatman and Harry Morse are unknown figures. The impact of racism on the history of the mergers is glossed over by Oneness students.

[dgreenja]

Greetings Mr. Richardson. I pray you will be fully well soon.
Have you ever debated Mr. Jerry Hayes? He and another oneness recently were engaged in a debate with two trinitarians included Dr. Edward Dalcour.

[alexanderh]

For those interested, please research Daniel Segraves’ point on Sharp’s 6th rule concerning Matthew 28:19, and the exceptions to it that Mr. Richardson conveniently left out.

[BennettJonWayne-xwvi]

Please help me understand exactly what it is that you are refuting. The Bible says that there is only One God. The Bible is clear on that, as the phrase "one God" appears multiple times in the Bible, both in the Old and New Testaments. The word "trinity" is not found anywhere in the Bible. I just did a google search, confirming that word "trinity" is not found anywhere in the Bible. An independent historical arbiter said (on Google): "The word 'trinity' appears nowhere in the Bible; the concept was finalized at the First Council of Nicaea in Rome, Italy in 325 CE after years of debate." In other words, there was no such thing as a "trinity" until the concept was invented approximately three hundred years after Christ left the earth. Are you refuting the Day of Pentecost? I don't get it.

[Post-Trib]

Who coined the word trinitas or trinity and who formulated the doctrine of the trinity?

Is Jesus the mystery and revelation and glory of God or is it the trinity?

[alexanderh]

Y’all talk about the trinity but can’t point to where it’s ever revealed personally in Scripture.

[davidcoleman]

For a thorough refutation of the arguments presented here with respect to baptism in Jesus' name, see Jason Weatherly's _Calling on the Name of Jesus._ The use of the name of Jesus is most certainly a formula, and the objection that the various New Testament references refer to “authority” are specious at best.

With respect to the Godhead, the presenter offers common objections from a platform of incoherence due to the logical contradictions inherent in all trinitarian doctrine. The logical extension of every iteration of the doctrine of the Trinity is either tritheism or divine composition. The former is a metaphysical impossibility while the latter is effective atheism. The doctrine of the Trinity (DT) doesn't even qualify as a template for biblical interpretation, let alone a standard against which to compare the Oneness doctrine.

[larryingram]

There was a big out pouring in edna ok in 1915

[alexanderh]

You know there’s so much wrong with this. It would take far too long of a post to unpack.

Jesus is whom the Bible is about. There is no other. It’s all about him. His name, his life, death, resurrection, ascension, Bride, Word, Spirit, 2nd coming, Lordship, heaven, healing, hope, love, peace, covenant, revelation, Word, etc. It’s all about Jesus! You will find no other than Christ, because he is the only God.

Don’t philosophize and overanalyze the Bible. Just believe it as it is written on the page. It’s that simple. God did it that way on purpose. Do that and obey it, and God will bring deeper revelation to you on his manifold mysteries. But there’s an order of things to follow first.

Be blessed in the only name of our God, Jesus Christ.

[alanhales]

Parham and Seymour weren't oneness people.