Music Theory of Noncommutative phase geometry: relativistic quantum biology Neidan Neigong Qi Prana

So because it's noncommutative phase we are also inverting the fractions so that it's 3 to the 12 divided by 2 to the 19th OR 2 to the 1/12th (1.05946) approximating 3 to the 1/19th (1.05953).
"there would be m and n integers such that (2:3)n = (1:2)m, that is, 3n = 2m+n, which is impossible, since the left term is odd and the right is even. "
"the ratios of type 2 to the m divided by 3 to the n OR 3 to the m divided by 2 to the n."
Professor Fabio Bellissima,"Epimoric Ratios and Greek Musical Theory," in Language, Quantum, Music edited by Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Federico Laudisa, Springer Science & Business Media, Apr 17, 2013
Alain Connes:
"the ear is only sensitive to the ratio, not to the additivity...multiplication by 2 of the frequency and transposition, normally the simplest way is multiplication by 3...2 to the power of 19 is almost 3 to the power of 12....time emerges from noncommutativity....What about the relation with music? One finds quickly that music is best based on the scale (spectrum) which consists of all positive integer powers q (to the n) for the real number q=2 to the 1/12th∼3 to the 1/19th. Due to the exponential growth of this spectrum, it cannot correspond to a familiar shape but to an object of dimension less than any strictly positive number. This means it is a zero dimensional object! But it has a positive volume!"
"It is precisely the irrationality of log(3)/ log(2) which is responsible for the noncommutative [complementary opposites as yin/yang] nature of the quotient corresponding to the three places {2, 3,∞}. The formula is in sub-space...."

So I got one ratio wrong as I said 2 to the 1/19th and 3 to the 12th. So I will correct this in the captions - that's why I use captions. But the error emphasizes this noncommutative secret of the phase change between the exponentials and the logarithms - that most people never notice when they learn music theory.
Alain Connes:
These chemists understood that most spectral lines were connected - these bar codes were connected to chemical products. And they invented a NEW chemical body called Helium which was supposed to have a specific bar code. And miraculously in the 20th Century during the eruption of Vesivium - analyses were made and indeed Helium was confirmed as indeed having that kind of spectral line.
Chemists and physicists studied these spectral lines and observed that there was Ritz-Rydberg's Law. When expressed in form of FREQUENCIES NOT IN TERMS OF WAVELENGTH - certain spectral lines add up to give new spectral lines.
And they understood that if you want to understand that kind of law - you had to use not ONE index (alpha and beta) but TWO indices. If you study spectral lines under that point of view you realize that certain lines are the addition of two different spectral lines.
This was a miraculously, wonderful discover that was made, thanks to Heisenberg. Heisenberg understood that this law of composition which is called Ritz-Rydberg's Law led immediately - if you are a physicist you concentrate on observable values - led to Matrice Mechanics. Of course mathematicians know about that but no physicists. If you make a product of two matrices you use precisely this Ritz-Rydberg law. You obtain the "ik" form the sum of "ijk" and "jk." The discover of Heisenberg was that these matrices were NOT COMMUTING.
The order of the terms have a Vital part to play... E=mc2 but you can't inverse the terms of this equation in this specific case. Commutativity does no longer hold in the phases of a microscopic system. This might be a difficult challenge but we tend to know that kind of phenomenon, because when we write things down using lanuage, we know that we have to take into account the ORDER in which we have to write the letters: if we don't we have sometimes the case of anagrams. In other words if you invert the letters, sometimes you can have a different sentence.
If you go from the quantum world to the normal world you lose meaning sometimes."
where he shows that the natural invariant of a shape given by its spectrum, I gave, explained to you why, is NOT enough to characterize the shape. You have to know a slightly more about it, you have to know the CHORDS and not only the [frequency] scale, in musical terms.
Because the spectra explains that the form that we're looking for is zero. And the reason we understand this is because we see this via the spectrum that is going exponentially because it's the same number at various powers. So the dimension obviously has to be zeros. So there's a fantastic answer: The quantum sphere

[hhdgdhum]

I observe Sacrad Geometry in everything in creation. Cymatics has always fascinated me.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

I saw one thing and the captions say the opposite - I corrected the math in the captions. haha. See the vid description for details. thanks