Christian Apologist STUMPS Atheist With UNANSWERABLE Question!

Dr. Frank Turek, founder of Cross Examined is a Christian Apologist and Speaker. He frequently visits college campuses to share his seminar "I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist" and afterwards he will allow students to ask questions. In this video, a student asks Frank a question about reason and why it's possible to reason without God. Frank quotes C.S. Lewis and then begins the process of breaking down the fallacies of the atheist worldview. In this video, I react to Frank asking this atheist an unanswerable question and provide added commentary to further expound on the topics presented in the discussion.

#apologetics #crossexamined

[WaRnb]

It takes a lot of faith to remain an Atheist... as a former HARDCORE, outspoken Atheist, I can attest of this fact. Praise be to God, I was newlyborn in Christ 6 years ago, and my life was miraculously turned around 180°.

[kylebrown]

Enjoy and appreciate your analysis. It helps those of us gain confidence when discussing this all-important topic. Bless You!

[robinpatrick]

Amen and on point with your commentary brother ❤

[mve]

A good reason to have some trust in our brain and in our ability to reason and use logic, is the fact that most of us will have pretty good experiences with using logic. For example: when you look out the window and see it snows, your brain/logic will tell you to put on warm clothes. Afterwards, when you go outside, you will conclude the logic you applied has helped you cope with the cold. I don't need a God to tell me to put on warm clothes when it is cold outside, my own brain is perfectly capable of applying this logic.

[jochav]

I’m grateful for you videos brother, they glorify God!

[apostlepaulvining]

Pastor, thank you my Brother in Christ Jesus so awesome to see TRUTH claimed in present day America again. We’re close to The Trumpet blast hallelujah to The LORD..!!!..

[debbie]

Brother, I'm so glad you're on our side. Subscribed!

[keithjoiner]

You, my friend, have explained things just as good, if not better, than the doctor on stage. You have the word in your heart.

[nickhancock]

Absolutely amazing video man, very well said. God bless ❤️

[leighcunningham]

Thank you for another informative video. You have been blessed with the gift of being able to explain the Word in a way that anyone can understand.

[seekingHimwhomysouloves]

Thank you!! This strengthens me for talks with family members who are currently non-believers.

[moegrant]

Praise the Lord!!! This is AWESOME!!!!

[dipaknadkarni]

Great channel.
I am happy that I found it.

[OhBoy-zybc]

Wow. Thank you for introducing me to the opening quote.

[MJT_]

None of what the apologist says equals a god. He thinks he has gotchas, but he doesn't. He thinks the audience member answering "I don't know" gives the opportunity to insert a god.
Examlles of watchmakers fallacy, god of the gaps fallacy.
How does the apologist know anything is true or trust? He just asserts a god.
What is more rational? Your answer is an omnipotent, omniscient, all powerful, personal, unproven, supernatural, thug... you think that's rational?
The video helped to support the atheist position. Well done.

[RyanKemperinOhio]

I love how Turek can dismantle someone’s argument with zero pride involved. He doesn’t get snarky or try to embarrass anyone. He’s out to change hearts, not just look smart.

[chadclark]

Very true, it’s a heart issue. They don’t want to be held accountable once they heard the message of the Gospel and Light overcoming darkness

[quicksilverjames]

The way you ended the video was presuppositional like it says in romans 1 also.

Great video

[smartazz]

I'm newly born again. It is so wonderful. It doesn't have to be complicated. Just faith in Jesus and the ability to understand we all sin and are forgiven when we invite Christ into our hearts. It's like a big warm envelope with no faults to be found.

[paulhondl]

04:00
On the camera-designer-god analogy...
A camera was designed by
a) many engineers
b) that themselves were not designed but born after a man and a woman had sexual intercouse
c) out of pre-existing material

So using your analogy, you are suggesting
a) polytheism
b) God is not the the first cause, not necessary, design cannot fully account for the creation of all things
c) creatio ex materia.

06:36
The current state of human brains is not solely based on random mutation. There are many factors within the theory of evolution that are not random.

09:18
By quoting Ephesians 4:18, as an Israelite soldier in ancient times, should I rather harden my heart towards Amalakite children, women and animals than hardening my heart towards God's command (Samuel 15:3)?