Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Galaxy S24 Ultra vs vivo X100 Pro Camera Test - Top Flagship Camera in India?

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, we've tested the top Android Flagship cameras, The Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Galaxy S24 Ultra and the vivo X100 Pro. So watch this video till the end and let us know what you think in the comment section below.

This review unit has been provided by the brand. However, the opinions in the video are completely based on my personal usage.

Do us a favour if you are reading this. Hit the Subscribe button and the Bell icon for notifications on our latest video drops.

Also subscribe to our other channels:

Video Highlights
***************************************************************
00:00 Intro
00:25 Camera Specifications
01:11 Primary Details
02:56 HDR Details
03:53 Primary Colours
04:39 Macro Details
04:50 Skin tone details
06: Selfie details
08:33 Video details
09:58 Camera UI
10:41 Conclusion
****************************************************************
Follow us on:

******************************************************************
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Been using Vivo X100 Pro for about 5 months now. I bet the engineers at Vivo were like "We have a Camera, and need to build a phone around it" lol unlike others "Lets make a phone"

officalJalgara
Автор

I have an S24 Ultra but my friend's X100 Pro's pics in the same settings blew me away. Trust the Samsung updates narrow the gap now.

naveenbalineni
Автор

Selfie camera on x100 pro has improved a lot compared to x90 pro.

gujjantirajesh
Автор

Finally you reviewed the camera of Vivo x 100 pro
Can't wait to see what's the Vivo x 200 pro capable of with 200mp zoom lens👀
Coming in just 3 mounths
If brands like samsung, google and apple coming with a slight improvements next year then Vivo beats them clearly

lankegowtham
Автор

X100 Pro is all rounder vivo should focus on video also

justchillok
Автор

Pixel in portrait mode 🤡 even with dedicated lens but can't use

chintugfx
Автор

@6:19 - I completely disagree with you here, as you can see the colour reproduction between each of the lenses is very different in Vivo. Although you had mentioned earlier that you are not considering colour reproduction into consideration, I believe you should have taken that also into account. Because a user who shoots photo in their mobile camera, isn't going to use professional software to match colour temperature between photos taken at different focal range. So I believe in this particular situation, Samsung does a great job in Portrait mode.

With that being said, kudos to your effort for making this detailed comparison. 👌🙌

adithyakrishnakumar
Автор

Bro liked vivo's skintone
I stopped watching further part

pratikmahapure
Автор

06:20 portraits zoom defined wrong
24mm - 1x
50mm - 2x almost
85mm - 3.7x
100mm 4.3x

abhayjaiswal
Автор

Samsung is set to release a 6.1.1 update for the S24 Ultra in the near future. This update is expected to enhance the camera's capabilities further.

darshpatel
Автор

7:28 Samsung's August update has indeed done some magic on my phone as well (S21FE green line).

anupamtiwary
Автор

I dont knw Ershad how you compared this cameras..
But I felt Pixel photos are better than Vivo in most of the segments..What is this skin tone blah blah..? Among these phones, Pixel shows the most accurate skin tone..Is that an issue?
And how can u buy a phone with that kind of video/audio quality over the other two.? Clearly, you are biased here..

afsalopk
Автор

What about Xiaomi 14 ultra.
You guys never talk about Xiaomi 14 ultra, it's always vivo or samsung

mannjain
Автор

I have both, S24 Ultra and X100 Pro, and I'm really surprised by X100 Pro's camera performance. Be it low light shots or daylight shots, vivo excels in every department. Its ultrawide shots are not too great but primary and telephoto shots are unbeatable. With every update, they keep improving the camera. I just got Funtouch OS 15 update based on Android 15 through beta test enrollment and it is buttery smooth. Vivo might not have as good brand value as Google and Samsung, but its flagship phones can beat samsung, apple and google anyday. X100 Ultra is one of the best camera phones made so far and I don't think Apple or Samsung could match the level of Photography X100 Ultra does. Zeiss collaboration is the cherry on the cake for Vivo. They really deserve appreciation for the work they have done with their flagships.
People who are commenting that this is a paid video, just go in a vivo store and experience the phone by yourself and compare the images, specially portrait photos with your own flagship, you would pee in pants after realising that Vivo outsmarted all your flagships.

pctricksguru
Автор

VivoX100pro the best camera phone today!
I don't think on the vivoX100pro Zeiss natural was enabled because it doesn't give that boosted colour in any shot.
Zeiss natural gives you the most natural results on any camera phone right now.

MOON-Hkr
Автор

looks like Vivo made limited stock of x100 pro, it is out of stock in reliance digital & Flipkart. only con about Vivo x 100 pro is its huge camera bump, they should've used s24 ultra like camera design, which would've looked much better

thetrigon
Автор

I think the pixel still more consistent and better in my opinion and about the software will be the kings in few years just wait

aryanagrawal
Автор

X100 pro is the king of all flagships in FY24...Like if you agree. (I am using x100 pro)

jagh
Автор

Hi, so I know you've touched on Indian skin tones recently which has been very useful!! Two things I discovered recently which makes a BIG difference on getting more accurate skin tones.

1 - Turn off Ultra HDR in advanced camera settings. (I noticed this makes a big difference in skin tones not appearing overly red.)

2 - Enable 'Frequent faces' (On pixel 6 and later including pixel fold, frequent faces can also help the camera show skin tones more accurately. (This info is on the Google help page for frequent faces.)

AmzMusic
Автор

Pixel pushed more on software manipulation over the years instead of improving their hardware equally. Lost the crown. Neither the best in photography nor videography. Google has always been lazy with their hardware products - the phones, the tablets etc

ArunkumarGR