Jay Dyer and the Error of Sola Scriptura (clip)

preview_player
Показать описание
#Logos #LogosRising #Christianity

In this clip goes over the problems and internal contradictions within the reformed theological doctrine of Sola Scriptura. Make sure to check it out and let me know what you think.
God bless 🙏

Thank you 🙏

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

As an evangelical, I’ve been studying Scripture for 22 yrs and each new season of growth and change in my theology has caused me to pause and conclude, I’m my own pope who formed my own tradition. Crazy. Now I’m considering Orthodoxy. (2024 update, I was chrismated in July 2023 and it’s been amazing)

ProtestantismLeftBehind
Автор

Intro liturgical song is other worldly

IndiaNumberOneCoubtry
Автор

JAY!!! Answering all of my questions. There is a modern baptist church that started reciting the Apostles Creed, while they sing their Maverick music Christian pop. Talk a mixed bag of confusion. I am finally coming to the conclusion that I am not a Protestant. “ … the group that has the most in common with the Protestants are the gnostics” 🔨 😮 I have attended Bible studies with women who buy books to take them through biblical teachings, and they decide on their own what scripture means. I am looking around bewildered while they argue with one another over the meaning of a scripture while referencing their Paula White study book. I got out quickly. That is not Christianity.

sabrinafair
Автор

This concise refutation of the solas should have millions of views. Top tier content to be sure!!!

Chrsi-oo
Автор

I see "Jay Dyer", i hit like. I see "Church of the Eternal Logos", i hit like... But there's only one like button for this video 😱😭😭😭
🎵nobody knows the trouble i see, nobody knows but jesus 🎵
😭

exposingpowerfullieslivest
Автор

Smiles almost the whole time just to say "dude" at the end. :-))

Προκείμενον
Автор

I love you guys and your content, you and our Orthodox brother Jay have helped me with defence of our faith and theological understanding.

AlphaOmegaTruth
Автор

“Jay Dyer and the Error of Sola Scriptura” sounds like a JK Rowling book lol

etheretherether
Автор

What was the writing that Jay mentioned about John of Damascus about starting with the Trinity as opposed to the Catholic starting point

alacrity
Автор

While certain Scriptural verses may promote "Sola Scriptura", it's Never explicitly mentioned that 1 should Be Sola Scriptura...

Where in the Bible does it Explicitly say Sola Scriptura?

cabellero
Автор

Whether Scripture is or is not the only infallible rule of faith for doctrine and regardless of who put the final stamp of approval on the Canon, if your traditions clearly contradict or go far beyond the words of the Prophets, Apostles, and Christ himself, I will side with them over your traditions.

MulunaLewi
Автор

I had to watch this three times to grasp the importance of what is being said. It really does demolish the sola scriptura position.

mrscream
Автор

please where i can read st cyril of alexandria writings related to eucharist is divine energy

hrd
Автор

Protestantism asserts that Any man can pick up a Bible and become a " teacher"
Like Joel Osteen?
Joyce Meyer?
Kenneth Copeland?
Jim Baker?

Like Anything else, becoming a teacher requires
Study
Commitment
Focus
Tenacity
Determination

You just don't wake up 1 morning and say " I think I'll teach at Harvard or UCLA Today!"

Doesn't work like that....

cabellero
Автор

Jesus blessed children and the disciples did not understand what He was doing at that time. Just as God is invisible, so too his little ones are invisible to the world and the establishments, even religious. God often speaks to his children but it is something that most scholars cannot handle and so they want to persecute Wisdom by using their intelligence. Scholars are often stoning God's children but we pray God have mercy on you

NorthernGate
Автор

I was not going to respond but I have to say something especially since many say protestants have not done a good job backing up Sola Scripturea another reason I am going to respond is because i can't help but notice a huge wave of protestant believers turn to orthodoxy and or catholicism. First let me begin by saying I consider myself someone humbly blessed with having a background in Theological studies and having read the Bible from start to beginning before, that doesn't make me better than anyone but i'd like to show myself approved and state why i feel qualified to respond, I too have my own Podcast on Facebook but am more centered on preaching Christ centered messages on there, strictly Gospel, however I have flirted with discussing such topics as these. I proceed with this debate regarding the Scriptures aka The Word of God being the supreme and final authority for the average Christian to go by, why? Well I do not believe it is that difficult to perceive, first and foremost because since the beginning of time we have read how God with HIS Word causes things to exist and Happen, in Genesis 1 God "SAID" let there be light and there was light, John 1:1 In the beginning was THE WORD, there is an importance in The term used WORD and Christ being The living WORD himself, now call it Sola Scriptura or whatever you want to call it The entire Jewish and Christian Bible where btw The first Bible was not the Canon made in the 3rd Century, It was actually The Jewish Tanakh compiled and made into a book in about 450 BCE which contains the entire Old Testament 5 books of Moses, The Historical Books, The Poetic writings, The Minor Prophets and the Major Prophets and years later the Septuagint which was the Greek copy of the Tanakh later added the Apocrypha books if you will i'll use that word so people know what i am referring to but those were also Jewish writings, so essentially no one can attribute to the first Bible being brought by the catholic church when in essence we really got everything from the Jews, now there is also history recording that when pope damasus asked Jerome for a canon later named the latin vulgate (Which he took from The Jewish Tanakh) there were already many copies of a bible elsewhere but not approved by the catholic church, just a little historic background, now In scripture we see a major emphasis on the importance of God's word over all else or mans opinions, in Exodus 32:32 It tells us of a Book in Heaven that God himself has in his possession, also in Psalm 119:89 The Holy Spirit reveals "Thy Word is forever settled in Heaven oh Lord" then in Mount Sinai We see how important it was for God to have his people keep his Word recorded in Writings, God himself wrote his commandments on Stone for His people to see and keep written down, another major example is Christ himself in Matthew 4 when he is in the desert He does all but respond to Satan by "It Is Written" also in John 5:39 he clearly says "Study The Scriptures" Also when Jesus went into the Synagogue to reveal himself He does what? He opens the scroll of Isaiah 61, again call it what you want but I see an emphasis on SCRIPTURE ALONE being the ultimate authority! Lets discuss the early church for a second, when The Holy Spirit comes upon the 120 in the upper room what is the first thing Peter starts to do? It clearly states he begins preaching the Gospel proclaiming Christ and revealing him fulfilled prophetically through the Scriptures, what scriptures was he citing? The OT of course, now lets talk about The Apostol Paul for a bit, this man knew 14 Languages 7 of which he spoke fluently, he was a very studied Hebrew and knew The Tanakh, Torah thoroughly, i've heard bogus arguments from orthodox stating that it was absurd to think only because there are only two letters found written to the Thessalonians that you can take only those two letters and think that is the only thing Paul would intend to be used as the only measure of faith written for them doctrinally but what they have failed to understand is that Paul was actually a walking Tanakh, of course he preached Christ to them but what did he also tell the Church in 1 Corinthians 11:1? He said imitate me as I imitate Christ and Christ emphasized "It Is Written" How else can I challenge Scripture over mere traditions of men? Well it's quite simple, in Colossians 2:8 "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, " So what did the Apostles teach and emphasize to the early Church? Have you not read 1 Thessalonians 2:13 where it gives us the answer stating "And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as a human word, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is indeed at work in you who believe." THE WORD OF GOD! My main challenge to the orthodox and catholics is to ask them if then they attain to their so called "holy traditions" if they were truly of God and necessary why is it then that we do not see the early church in The book of Acts or The written in Pauls letters and the letters of the New Testament urging believers to practice many of those things they call traditions? were they not necessary? Another important thing to note is that many of the traditions practiced by 3rd century believers seem to have been passed down by a Roman Christianity, let's be honest the first christians were Jewish and did not have the same traditions as the gentiles with only the exception that they were now Jews who accepted Christ so that's my other observation regarding tradition essentially whos traditions and cultures are we referring to? I have so much more to say but I will semi end this time with this, Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Is The Same, Yesterday, Today and Forever More" Also in the Old Testament God in Malachi 3:6 6 "For I am the Lord, I change not;" "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away." Matthew 24:35, a side note by the way one of the issues I encountered and I have against orthodox is that they won't call protestants brothers unless you are chrismated and or baptized into one of their churches which is sad because I do not need to be chrismated by them to know I am a child of God, John 1:12 tells me "But to all who believed him and accepted him, he gave the right to become children of God." Though I am not ready to say all orthodox or catholics are condemned I can only say like Peter said in 2 Peter 1:5 "5 For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; 6 and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; 7 and to godliness, mutual affection; and to mutual affection, love." Also you must "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." 2 Timothy 2:15, anyone open to discuss this with me I am more than happy to do so, my Facebook page is found by Searching "Tony Vasquez" or on Instagram as "tjlimt" or simply respond to me here, Peace and Blessings.

tonyvasquezjr
Автор

Our starting point is Peter whom you also agree to be an apostle, what?

amaledward
Автор

Can you explain your channel name. Are you founding your own Church denomination?

hummingbirdfeeder
Автор

John 3:16 - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

What is the orthodox view on several of Johns verses where it states 'who ever believes in Christ shall have everlasting life'.

Does orthodox say this scripture is unture? If so, why?

dillonc
Автор

Give up the Solas and replace it with somas instead. 🥴

iwads
visit shbcf.ru