24 FPS vs 60 FPS Comparison in 30 Seconds (for filmmakers)

preview_player
Показать описание
Just a quick little video that goes a long way : )

#24FPS #60FPS #24vs60

⏩ Check out my other social media! -
Instagram
Website
Get your Button Pushrs merch here!

Join Thematic!

📸 List of gear I use the most for my videos -
Canon 1DX Mark III
Canon EOS R5
Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS
Canon 85mm f/1.2 L IS
Canon 50mm f/1.2 L
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 ART
Rode VideoMic Pro+
H4n Pro Audio Recorder
RODE NTG4+ Shotgun Microphone

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Watch it a few times! If you really try to pay attention to how smooth the videos are, you'll see 60 is really fluid liquid smooth but seems unnatural compared to the 24 which is a bit choppier but seems easier to watch!

Minhute
Автор

60 frames per second looks more like how the eye and brain perceive things. 24 frames per second has a cinematic look, that to most people is pleasing, even though it's slightly choppy. 24 frames per second looks best if the camera's shutter speed is set at 1/48 sec, which yields 50% motion blur. Shutter speeds that are faster than 1/48 sec will have a strobing effect. A global shutter in a video camera looks better than a rolling shutter, since the individual frames look similar to frames in a movie camera. Films in theaters look better than when seen on video. That's because todays films when they are transferred to video look choppier than when they're viewed in movie theaters. In order to transfer films at 24 frames per second to video at 30 frames per second, every 4th frame has to be repeated, which doesn't appear as smooth as when viewed in movie theaters. That, my friends, is my lesson for the day. At ease, soldiers. 🤠

captainozone
Автор

This video has convinced me of the opposite of the video creator's conclusion.
4k60 looks massively better than 4k24.

myblacklab
Автор

"looks too smooth to be 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡"
"60 is a bit too 𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙖𝙡"

wonder what reality this guy lives in

rikognito
Автор

"It looks too smooth to be real"

that's like... the opposite of what it looks like. it looks to smooth to be fake

derekschinke
Автор

My question is how come 60fps on a Canon G7X Mark II is regular speed and 60fps on a Sony A7SIII considered slow mo?

KingNeu
Автор

24fps till I die. 60fps is for soap operas.

OfficialChrisToney
Автор

How were you able to edit it or you did not get in challenge while uploding

danielyismashewa
Автор

24fps is not better than 60, it's just that we associated the idea of cinema with the 24fps.
60fps is "closer" to real life than 24, we're just not used to watching movies in 60fps.

r.v.
Автор

"60 fps is too smooth" what!? I don't understand
We didn't move 24 times per sec, how can lower frame rate be more "natural"?

boontarin
Автор

I actually experience the exact opposite: 24 fps looks unnatural uneasy and choppy to me, 60 fps more in line with reality and MUCH easier to look at without the same strobe effect. Well, I do play more on PC in high framerates than going to the cinema, so I guess it is all down to what our brain has been accustomed too - I believe it is all about the plasticity of our minds - or rather the lack thereof that determines what we prefer. I think of Higher framerates as just higher temporal resolution, it "downside" compared to 24 when it comes to movies is that it is more revealing (like spatial resolution) and thus like spatial resolution helps reflect reality better the higher the framerate (just as with resolution). That is why high framerates is perfect for sports, as it reveals more of the real-life movement energy and inertia, but it also reveals that actors in a movie are actually acting, making it look "movie-unreal" by reflecting actual acted reality better; It becomes like going to the non-movie theater and our brains are simply not accustomed to that when it comes to movies. Had we never been accustomed to 24 fps by the constraints in early technology (it was even lower before 24 fps), we might have had very different opinions than those we have by our historical habituations.

TBCMV
Автор

Fire video. Short and to the point. Thanks

billylawson
Автор

the choppiness is kinda distracting at 24fps, even in movies if I'm being honest

SubStarLex
Автор

A smoother video is easier to watch for me. So 60 does it in my opinion, especially when panning and capturing motion.

cofjbir
Автор

short and obvious to realize, thanks 💙

you.League
Автор

Simple and effective, I also used 24fps and slow it to 95% for my videography b roll, mostly cause my camera only goes to 4k24fps, but I get 60 fps is good for slow mo b roll, but it’s over used imo, I like just gimbal slow and steady subtle movements in 24 and it works for myself in videos

BRONZALiVE
Автор

i think my goldielocks zone is 50 fps .. it looks natural to me.. 24 looks mega choppy. Im used to computer screens with high frame rates and smart phones.. neither have this choppy display. So yes old movies, but even now a lot of TVs and stuff change it so its higher framerate or make it looks like it is.

djmouglie
Автор

I've noticed that not many people on YouTube discuss the benefits of 60fps for smoother video quality. If you're into drone cinematography, you'll understand that anything less than 60fps can appear choppy. However, this issue is easily fixed with 60fps, and in post-production, you can slow down footage without any problems.What am I missing?

BelizeByDrone
Автор

This is just so so wrong. Most of the videos I watch on youtube are action vlogs captured in 60fps, racecar footage, skateboarding footage, etc, vlogs of racedrivers or skateboarders. All of these videos look and feel extremely natural at 60fps. I am so used to that look that when I see a 24/30fps video I am like "uuughhh disgusting". Regardless of how much shutter speed or motion blur you add to 24fps, the 60fps videos just seem more natural.

fifthgear
Автор

Everything you just said was subjective, the 60hz looks so much better than 24hz... Long term, 24hz micro stutter with frame skipping will give you a headache...

DerickMcAfee