24 FPS vs 30 FPS vs 60 FPS (OUTDATED! CHECK DESC!!)

preview_player
Показать описание
Enjoy!

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is an oversimplified way 24fps works in movies. The reason why movies dont look as laggy as this video is due to shutter speed/motion blur.

tamyftw
Автор

Few problems with how you've done it. 1. You recorded it once at 60fps and derived 30 and 24 from it by dropping half of the frames for 30 and using the 3:2 pulldown for 24. For 30 this is fine since it's an even division, but for 24 this is less than ideal. Makes it easier to film, though, so understandable. 2. Not enough motion blur. You used the default settings for 60fps filming(1/125 shutter speed), which is only acceptable when filming a shot that is ONLY intended for slow motion, no full-speed playback and no speed-ramping. The 180-degree shutter angle """rule""" is a false practice that ruins footage, regardless of frame rate or pulldown.

And if you think about it in terms of time, it makes sense. 1/60th of a second shutter speed will capture 1/60th of a second of time and all of the movement that happens within it. It doesn't matter if you do it once (still picture), 24 times, 30, 48, 50, or 60 times per second, each frame will be 1/60th and the motion blur will look like 1/60th of a second. When you film 60fps at the 180-degree rule (1/120th or 1/125th), and then cut it down to 30 or 24, your motion blur doesn't scale back down, because the shutter speed/angle doesn't change when you remove frames. You effectively have 24 or 30fps content shot at 1/125th shutter speed, which is suddenly WAY outside the 180-degree rule, anyway.

*BOTTOM LINE*
Natural motion blur happens in the 1/40th to 1/60th of a second shutter speed range. Anything outside of that will look like ass. Also, cutting down 60 to 30 (or any frame rate divided evenly) and running that 30 in a 60fps video is fine, but doing so with 24 or any other uneven pulldown will compound the laggy look of it even more. It's somewhat okay to do this with 24 because the 3:2 pulldown for 24 into 60 is so standardized and ingrained, but still.

*SOLUTION*
If you want to redo this test fairly, but simply, go re-shoot it with a 1/60th shutter speed and make sure you lock the shutter speed by either going full manual exposure control or selecting shutter priority mode auto exposure. If you want to do it as accurately as possible, go shoot it 3 different times and edit then post 3 different videos all at native frame rates of 24, 30, and 60fps respectively, but once again, make sure they're ALL set to the same shutter speed for fairness.

If you want, you can INCLUDE other shutter speeds in the 30 and 24 examples, and even compare 60p-1/60th with 60p-1/125th to spread the word that 180-deg is BAD and WRONG, but if you do this, make sure you have a caption for when the shutter speeds change.

Obviously, you typically can't go below the frame rate for shutter speed, so while some people might like 30fps or 60fps at 1/60 better than 24fps 1/60, once you lower the shutter to 1/40th or 1/50th, they may end up liking the lower rates even more than a 60fps example that doesn't look like jittery, under-blurred, unrealistic, soap opera crap.

Drunken_Hamster
Автор

With pov view, 60 FPS looks natural but if your looking an exterior view (like watching movie) it appears accelerated

superluciole
Автор

Awesome comparison! helped a lot to choose 60fps

fhwpvktmxk
Автор

I don’t get how people find 24 fps “natural”. My vision is not choppy like that. 120 fps seems way more natural.

nospellingoutloud
Автор

Honestly, I don't see a difference, but I feel a difference. I don't mind 30 fps tbh

someone
Автор

So... the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps is visible when you watch it at speed 0.5?

FrankGelbeet
Автор

Music not good for our soul makes it uncontrolled😢

haahmed
Автор

I record my band when we play a club. Which rate do you think would be best? I normally use 30. Would 60 be better?

jefizz
Автор

E notado cuando los videos los convierto en la PC para bajarle el tamaño de gb y q están en 29.97 fps después noto q el vídeo tiene breves momentos de camara lenta pero si los convierto en 60fps no pasa nose por qué será Saludos desde chile

Gerardoxn
Автор

In speed 0.5, the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps is visible.

In normal speed, there is no difference.

FrankGelbeet
Автор

for me, 24 is choppy but acceptable, 30 is how i see the world and 60 has almost bo difference than 30

GloryToUSA
Автор

Thanks for the comparison! The slowdown is pretty pointless, though 😁

Dennis-nxgj
Автор

Which FPS is More Bettet For Tiktok and Instagram Reels ?

Boismart
Автор

Those who own PlayStation 3 and Xbox One Fat devices will choose 24 frames. Those who own PlayStation 4 will choose 30 frames. Those who have a PlayStation 5 will choose 60 frames. Those who own an Xbox Series will choose 120 frames. Those who have a computer will decide what is best. As for Nintendo devices, I don't know 😅 Thanks for the comparison

redaahmed
Автор

Me watching in 144p I don't see any difference.

Gol_D_Looks
Автор

30 fps on my phone doesn't look like that at all..

blowrp
Автор

30 is and will be sweet for for youtube and movie content

_twzrd_
Автор

thats why I love DJI FPV drones.. 60fos rules!

jezus
Автор

With me higher is better. 60fps look great. It so smooth. In 24fps i see clearly flicker

jonynguyen