Balls: The difference between 24 fps vs 60 fps

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"But the human eye can't see over 30 frames per second?" - Some butt hurt console fanboy.

roguehypehdch
Автор

Comparison would have been good with 120hz video where both 24 and 60 are perfectly divisible. (And displayed with 120hz monitor to show it properly.)
Now using 60fps video 24fps has extra judder as it is shown uneven frames. (apparently 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3.. etc.)

pottuvoi
Автор

Wow that 24 frame shitvision is so cinematic

Fantosonium
Автор

Is it weird that I still noticed the difference when I switch from 720p60 to 480p? The 24fps ball looked a lot jumpier than the 60 fps ball in 480p.

jerrolddelosreyes
Автор

when it moves faster u need a higher fps thats why it exist with monitor like 144hz ones. In this video it moves really slow so not much difference, only one is blurry and one is smoother. when u play a game or a movie u need a higher fps, thats why u need them in order to get it from ur eyes to ur brain faster+ final answer= human can see up to about only 70-80fps when moving really fast.

masonexe
Автор

balls was the name of my movie premiere.

it wasn't for kids, so don't look it up.

O_Obsidious
Автор

All my gaming videos are 60fps now thanks google for finally giving us this option!

Trisky
Автор

When you set the frame cap to 240 but delete the zero.







techystar
Автор

But in Movies, the 24FPS are looking better because of motion blur!

flmmkr
Автор

even a 60 to 75hz jump is noticable, i went from 60hz screen to 75hz and its just better.

ausintune
Автор

I'm with LG plasma tv and 60 fps ball looks the same all the time :) to bad all led, lcd even OLED tv can't reach this level of motion blur .

AntrAcsA
Автор

Tested this on ipad pro 10.5, the ghosting when 60fps ball rolling are TOO obvious too notice. Having pro motion 120hz with ghosting effects make high frame rate contents on ipad pro inferior compare to smart tv with frame interpolation at 60fps.

aclx
Автор

Why are cinematic movies at 24 fps but don't look laggy?

MaxRamos
Автор

And yet, Hollywood insists on telling us, that 24p is better...🙄

rolandrohde
Автор

Thats not always correct:
For example : i cast from my smartphone to my nvidia shield for football, my nivida was on 59.94 and then 60 but it shocked a little bit.
I set my nividia on 50 and it plays it smooth :).

And with kodi i set it on 60 not on 59.94, i find it better on 60. But if you also have on 60fps schoking image set it on 23.98 because most movies are 23.98 or 24 if you download = smooth playing :).

You have to find out what is the best fps until you have no more schoking image.

So here in my nvidia options 50fps, in kodi 60 fps.

FlubFlubber
Автор

I'm to understand that the human eye and brain can't process over 30 fps. So why 60 accept for doing good slow mo shots?

blakealanm
Автор

Это абсолютно неправильное. Нельзя делать сравнение 24 и 60 fps, через видео с частотой 24fps.

DS.
Автор

The 24 fps seems to have jerkier movement and it doesn't hurt to use a higher fps rate for certain things.

amandastevens
Автор

Plz teach this guy: +marvin5307ma 60 fps is good btw. I know how what is the difference between 30 fps, 48 fps, 50 fps and 60 fps.

kenjistricksandtips
Автор

Higher frame rate reduces blur and is much smoother. All the comparison videos on YouTube don't prove shit. You have to be there to really notice the difference.

The only difference you can see here is reduced blur with 60fps when your eyes are following the ball

seanmcdermott