Solving For A Nice Function

preview_player
Показать описание
🤩 Hello everyone, I'm very excited to bring you a new channel (aplusbi)
Enjoy...and thank you for your support!!! 🧡🥰🎉🥳🧡

When you purchase something from here, I will make a small percentage of commission that helps me continue making videos for you.
If you are preparing for Math Competitions and Math Olympiads, then this is the page for you!
CHECK IT OUT!!! ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

If you need to post a picture of your solution or idea:
#radicals #radicalequations #algebra #calculus #differentialequations #polynomials #prealgebra #polynomialequations #numbertheory #diophantineequations #comparingnumbers #trigonometry #trigonometricequations #complexnumbers #math #mathcompetition #olympiad #matholympiad #mathematics #sybermath #aplusbi #shortsofsyber #iit #iitjee #iitjeepreparation #iitjeemaths #exponentialequations #exponents #exponential #exponent #systemsofequations #systems
#functionalequations #functions #function #maths #counting #sequencesandseries

#algebra #numbertheory #geometry #calculus #counting #mathcontests #mathcompetitions
via @YouTube @Apple @Desmos @NotabilityApp @googledocs @canva

PLAYLISTS 🎵 :

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Shouldn't the difference in domain be mentioned as well as part of the solution?

cd_hnds
Автор

I think you can generalise the second method just a little...

Say f((ax + b)/(cx + d)) = ((cx + d)/(lx + m))

Then we follow the methodogy of taking the reciprocal as you did, and then break the denominator as follows

n(ax +b) + p(cx + d) = lx + m

solve for n and p [it wont always haave a solution, but it still as formalised general explanation for the methodoly], split the denominator into the sum of the whole number p and partial fraction (n(ax + b)/(cx + d)), then substitute the partial fraction with another variable (what you called y), and get the solution.

RajAgarwal-pgkn
Автор

I substituted x by (λ+1), i got f((λ+2)/λ)= λ/(4λ+2), then i substitued λ again by 1/x . after simplifying, i found : f(2x+1) = 1/(2x+4) and then i found that f(x) = 1/(x+3) for all real x not equal to -3, 1/2 and 1

tenkey
Автор

Why did you substitute x with x+1/x-1 just to get f(y) if you had already called x+1/x-1 = y? Really love the videos though

henricovsky
Автор

how do you make these questions, i want to learn

bohemiathakur
Автор

it's also interesting to note how the input x into f((x+1)/(x-1)) can't be 1 b/c of zero denominator, but also how f(x) can't have input x being 1 as well, since (x+1)/(x-1) can never equal 1... however in the f(x) you obtained 1/(x+3), it makes it seem that you can input x = 1 into f(x).... so I'm a little confused here and would need some clarification as to what is the correct answer? Kindly please let me know :)

bobmarley
Автор

Definition of quantity=D
D={ℝ\ -1; 1; 0, 5}
f(x+1/x-1) - (x-1/4x-2)=0
f(0+1/0-1) - (0-1/4•0 -2)= -1 - 1/2= -1, 5
x≠0; <=> f• (x-1/4x-2) =>

(x+1)/(4x-2)= |0, 45| +1/4•|0, 45|-2
<=>1, 45/3, 8=0, 38 <=> x=|0, 45l
We make the proof with functional constants:
[|ln(π•5, 5φ/e^2)|]+1÷[|ln(π•5, 5φ/e^2)|]-1=
[|ln(π•5, 5φ/e^2)|]-1÷(4•[|ln(π•5, 5φ/e^2|)]-2
<=>[ 0, 38 = 0, 38 with x=|0, 45|]
x=|0, 45| = |ln(π•5, 5φ)/e^2|
Functional operator: (x-1) with limit 0, 38^2

anestismoutafidis