Electrical Engineering: Ch 3: Circuit Analysis (35 of 37) Solving Basic Transistor Circuit (MESH) 2*

In this video I will used the MESH method to find the voltages across a 200ohm resistor and across the collector and the emitter of a transistor circuit.

Next video in this series can be seen at:

[Thefarnworth]

Sir, This lecture was incredible; I am an 81 year old man and I have been trying for hours to calculate something similar on a practical circuit, you have made me so happy that my old brain is still functioning OK, your explanation was so lucid and I appreciate the way you did not edit the minor error; a lesson in caution. Thank you.

[Livewithhonour]

I just want to thank you, I spend all semester in an electronics class and just couldn't grasp the methods my teacher was describing to us to solve circuits like these, the mesh method honestly is the reason I passed the course, Thanks a bunch. I'll be watching your stuff regularly for the rest of my academic career in the Instrumentation program.

[LoxagosSnake]

Mr. van Biezen, I don't usually do this, but I have to thank you from the depths of my heart. Due to your magnificent teaching material, I managed to pass an Electronics exam with a grade among the top of the class. All that after a few years of absence from lectures. Successfully passing this course with a high grade means that I'll probably be admitted to a dream Masters' program in Radio Engineering.


I owe more than half of that to you. You are one of the best teachers I've ever had.

[terencewright]

Like the previous comment, I am 80.
I wished you were my lecturer all those years ago. I would have understood far better . Thank you so much for this video.

[munyankindiaugustinofficia]

I AM A Physics teacher but from the beginning of my whole study about transistors, i never got the best way of solving these types of problems .Now i give thanks to you all

[Thinkerko]

Wow! Michael, I have watched so many of your physics videos and I can tell you hands down that you are the best physics teacher I have ever seen in my entire life. I have managed to pass my physics course with a pretty high mark of 95% thanks to your videos. I wish my professors were like you. So, I am currently taking transistor course and it is difficult to follow all the material given in the lecture, so I thought I should watch some YouTube videos to help me through and when, to my surprise, I see your videos show up in my search query, well I can't even begin to describe how happy I feel, I am so glad that you cover transistors in your videos. Michael, you are the best and your videos are pure gold( I should probably say pure Rhodium, rare and valuable at the same time)! I have shared your videos with all my friends and they all love them. Thanks so much for your hard work!

[paranormaledits]

it's 4 am and I have my final exam tomorrow, I was stuck on this topic and your videos worked like magic for me. That was very good explanation, thank you so much

[latinomandoesntfollowtheru]

man i couldnt thank you enough, you are the first one on the internet that explains everything rigorously. It is clear that you understand the basics 10/10 and you made me understand them too, not like other guys that say for example this point has 3v and i couldnt get how that was possible since a point cannot has any voltage difference by definition. btw you explained that is was in reference to the ground. It seems obvious but saying it makes the difference since everyone on the internet suposses that all the viewers have a perfect understanding of the basics when is clear that it isn't the case. i understood it all perfectly, thanks for that man. i wish i could give you more than 1 like :)

[gubby]

Just a small correction: The variable Vec should actually be named Vce, because there is a difference. In general, If we have Vab, that means Va - Vb. In that case the rise is Vc - Ve, so it should be named Vce

[maxpolaris]

This is great! I haven't studied this stuff in 40 years! It's all coming back to me now. 😁 Free Tech School!

[roberttshitenda]

I like the way you are solving kvl sir, by going opposite current direction meaning from ground to up (Vcc)

[charlvanniekerk]

My exam is tomorrow morning at 8 and I have this exact question in my textbook. You helped me get it right and remember how to do these. Thank you very much!

[tvz]

I wish I had this guy teaching this to me when I went thru my first and second electronics class 30+ years ago!

[mrFAhRNhiT]

Great video.
At 4:06, I used the Ie = (101)Ib equation.
I did Vo = Ie*Re = (101*Ib)*(200) = 2.868v

[nikosiwannoy]

A big thank you to you Sir! Great lecture, on point. Seems like i'm gonna pass my exam now !

[PunmasterSTP]

MESH? More like "Magnificent lectures? Yes!" 👍

[munyankindiaugustinofficia]

It is a very attractive presentation even if it is not well visible

[dfyre_rett]

Why is it V_ec instead of V_ce in the second part of the problem? I thought it would be +V_ce in the equation since there's a voltage rise going from E to C. The polarities aren't marked in the circuit for C and E so I assumed the + is by C since that seems to be where it is typically

[weekendkru]

I should have watched this 24 hours ago. I would not have failed my exam earlier.

[nurulradziah]

Thankyou so much for these videos. It helped me a lot for my exams during this pandemic :')