Shroud Of Turin Update (New Evidence)

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Discover groundbreaking new evidence that could authenticate the Shroud of Turin as a 2000-year-old relic tied to Jesus Christ. Join us as we explore the latest scientific findings that challenge centuries of skepticism and controversy.

[barbaracommins]

O Divine Imprint of a perfect human being.

[alexhadebe]

Amazing amazing Glory to the king 👑 of Kings our Ineffable Holy and Righteous God Jesus Christ amen ❤

[JetLagRecords]

Destiny Image, This is fantastic! I subscribed right away!

[ellabeasley]

I have believed in the shroud for many many years. I have many pictures of it through my house. Back in early 2000s I came across a 2 way postcard, with a painting of Jesus over the shroud picture.
Awesome!!! Love it!!!

[jjt]

Perfect timing. At a moment when christianity is in a shamble, at a moment when Occident wants to sack Islam, suddenly, the shroud of Turin is declared genuine. Que du bonheur! Now which lab did the analysis? And according to what I see, I did not know the vikings went to Palestine in the first century of history. Was jc a viking? Obviously, this is not the end of the story.

[joetunon]

My thoughts: it is terribly suspicious that they don't redo the carbon test properly and put an end to the debate. The new x-ray method places the shroud in the rough time of Christ, but the carbon test does not line up with it, and it was supposedly a flawed test. Well, then, do it again and do it properly. What's the problem?

[JustMe-mnhk]

My thoughts are anytime someone say" it could be" I've never seen a reindeer fly but I don't know it could be! Lol

[glorygracek.]

There was absolutely nothing new or updated about ghis at all. Should you really be clicking baiting this? Guess you just have your conscious and soul to live with.

[Leo-dotu]

If this much weight of Evidence would have occured in any Scientific Investigation, the Null hypothesis would have been Rejected out right

[jeromepopiel]

I wouldn't make an image "my Jesus" That's an idol

Looks too perfect. The Bible says Jesus was beaten beyond recognition and didn't even look human. This is not needed for those who have faith.

[johnnilan]

It cannot be the burial cloth of Christ as the face on the cloth is prominent. It would not have appeared if you believe the testimony of the first pope and John the Apostle. Both of them recount in John 20:4-7 their observations not realizing that they would later discount the burial cloth image. The face cloth used to cover the brutalized face of Jesus is folded separately by itself. The face cloth would have prevented a uniform image if an image of the face at all. See also John 11:44 recounting the wrappings of Lazarus. He had a face cloth which had to be removed separately. This is never referred to in any of the scientific testing as a factor in commending the investigation. Also, the Greek word for wrappings is not used for a one piece of linen or shroud. The problem is that the Catholic Church granted indulgences to visit and worship the cloth. A recent pope has acknowledged the carbon dating results. The Catholic Church has never actually commended the shroud as what it purports to be. Silence is a denial.

Take a moment and recall the recent fraud perpetrated on the LDS Church by an expert forger. He used blank pages from ancient manuscripts and forged writings that the LDS bought. So, the underlying fabric like the underlying parchments in the LDS fraud are not proof at all. What is more no specimens of burial spices have been found on the cloth despite finding of pollen. See, John 19:40. Why is there no memorialization by the gospel writers of such an image on the cloth? Because it did not exist. This shroud tradition was developed following the tradition of "Veronica's veil" memorialized in the stations of the cross in Catholic weekly ritual. Veronica's veil is not extant! Let's get over this old fraud used to garner indulgence payments to fund the Catholic Church. "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." Dale Carnegie.

[timothya.olmeda]

Great…they finally have the evidence for when the someone forged a lie and made a fake crime scene about a mere mortal man who was never eligible for being messiah in the first place.

Now let’s move on to the true Jewish messiah ben David.


Ezekiel 37:24-25

“David My servant shall be king over them, and they shall all have one shepherd; they shall also walk in My judgments and observe My statutes, and do them. Then they shall dwell in the land that I have given to Jacob My servant, where your fathers dwelt; and they shall dwell there, they, their children, and their children’s children, forever; and My servant David shall be their prince forever.”


The Jesus agenda dismantled. 🛠️

[Obeytheroadrules]

Even if it was from the same era, doesn’t prove resurrection, also Romans plucked the beards of crucified people. This shroud has a beard

[jacktracy]

CHRIST was not wearing a shroud but was buried with linen burial clothing and a separate item called here a "napkin" which had been bound around HIS HEAD. John 20:5 KJV "And he (John) stooping down, and looking in (CHRIST's burial cave), saw the linen clothes lying; yet he went not in.
6 Then came Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulcher, and saw the linen clothes lie
7 And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself."
Also, see the description of the Jewish burial clothing Lazarus wore and the napkin bound around his head when raised from the dead (John 11:44 KJV).
Why not any information listed in the Gospels about the shroud??? Surely they would have found it and kept it and talked about it. They did not. The reason why is that GOD does not want anyone venerating anything other than HIM.

[TheHeavyassaulter]

So nothing new, we already have seen this image since the 80s..

[sureshot]

Any born again believer has the HOLY SPIRIT. Ask HIM if it's his shroud. I did and HE said it's not!

[czarcastic]

Quit manipulating the shroud with CGI nonsense. The cloth shows a freakishly long armed image with grossly long fingers and an older looking face.

[morganren]

Ya ya ya... and the Mormons have gold tablets from god.

[DevinNichols-oj]

It is a fabrication. Clearly!

Luke 24:12
NAS: in, he saw the linen wrappings
KJV: he beheld the linen clothes laid
INT: he sees the linen clothes
John 19:40
NAS: and bound it in linen wrappings
KJV: it in linen clothes
INT: bound it in linen cloths
John 20:5
NAS: in, he saw the linen wrappings lying
KJV: and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying
INT: lying the linen cloths
John 20:6
NAS: and he saw the linen wrappings lying
KJV: and seeth the linen clothes lie
INT: sees the linen cloths lying.

[D_Espi]

But they can’t prove the man that was wrapped in. It was actually Jesus or not.