We Need To Talk About This New Evidence For The Shroud of Turin

Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize!

Also if you like what I do and wish to support my work to help me make sure that I can continue to tell it how it is please consider checking out my patreon! Unboxings are Patreon exclusives!

Link to my documentary on the Shroud

The video interview I'm using to build up a discussion

Also here are links for your personal research on the Shroud
Here is a link to the TSC

And further research material:

%3F&oq=is+the+shroud+of+turin+a+fake
%3F+&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i22i30j0i390l2.3691j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
%20negative%20is,the%20darkest%20areas%20appear%20lightest.

Also Check out Giulio Fanti's work and books on the matter

The Shroud of Turin is a fascinating and controversial religious artifact that has captivated both believers and skeptics for centuries. It's a long linen cloth bearing the faint image of a man who appears to have suffered injuries consistent with crucifixion. Many Christians believe this cloth to be the actual burial shroud of Jesus Christ, though the Catholic Church has maintained a neutral stance on its authenticity.
The shroud's documented history begins in mid-14th century France, but it has been housed in Turin, Italy since 1578. The image on the cloth shows both the front and back of a bearded man, and the method of its formation remains a mystery that continues to puzzle researchers.
Scientific studies have been conducted on the shroud, with carbon dating tests in 1988 suggesting a medieval origin. However, these results have been challenged by some researchers who argue that the tested samples may have been contaminated. This controversy has fueled ongoing debates among scientists, historians, and religious scholars about the shroud's true age and nature.
The Shroud of Turin is rarely displayed publicly, but when it is, it draws millions of visitors. It remains a subject of intense interest, blending elements of faith, history, and scientific inquiry. Despite numerous studies, the origin and authenticity of the shroud continue to be hotly debated, making it one of the most studied and controversial religious artifacts in history.

#shroud #jesus #history

[metatronyt]

Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize!

Also if you like what I do and wish to support my work to help me make sure that I can continue to tell it how it is please consider checking out my patreon! Unboxings are Patreon exclusives!

The video interview I'm using to build up a discussion

[firingallcylinders]

Thats actually why the Punic Wars were happening, Carthage was breaking Spaghetti

[maddog]

I love that universally Italians have a kryptonite of breaking spaghetti needles 😂😂

[RestingJudge]

At the end, as a Catholic, a fragment of the Eucharist is infinitely more valuable to me than the shroud, but it is fascinating. It seems to be the gift that keeps on giving in terms of research.

[AtsircEcarg]

Its legitimacy doesn’t make or break my faith but I do find it fascinating.

[jameswells]

Researcher: < breaks spaghetti noodles>

Metaron: "DEATH TO THE HERETIC!"

[johannjohann]

The fact there are no other shrouds that have been found like it, even fake does make the shroud most interesting. Especially when scientists are unable to explain with any certainty how it was made even if it is a forgery.

[eazygamer]

I agree with metatron. My curiosity in shroud has always been from an interest in a cool piece of historical curiosity.

[lesissmilinglytryin]

I am not even Italian and I wanted to march (well roll; i am paraplegic) with the Roman Legions when I saw him break the spaghetti. "Let us March!"

[shaunpatrick]

I expect my socks have a lot of broken fibres, but that doesn't mean they're old. The Shroud was kept in Turkey for centuries and regularly taken out of its box to be displayed, so that might have lead to more broken fibres than you'd find on a cloth from Masada that had been left in a jar for 1900 years.

[oldschoolhistory]

The most incredible thing about the shroud is the negative image showing the face; it wasn't discovered until 1898, many hundreds of years after even the alleged date of forgery. It's hard to see how forgers could have created such an image, so much more lifelike than the iconic artwork of the time, in a way that would not even be apparent for centuries.

[unarealtaragionevole]

21:30 Another major factor he didn't mention about the C14 testing, was that the scientists didn't get to choose the location of the sample. They originally wanted a few different locations and we denied, then they wanted a few samples from the same local region of the cloth and were denied again. The authorities didn't want any more material loss, or potential future material loss, from the regions suggested because they were worried about the damage it would do to the cloth with time.

[zdance]

I am an art Conservator and a researcher in cultural heritage field. I can confirm what Metatron suspected, that the analysis of the cellulose depolimerization degree is too linked to the aging condition for being relatable when speaking about dating an object. It is in fact not generally used this way, but only for assessing the conservation state of the object. It is a cumulative damage that cannot be repaired once happened (despite some promising new techniques) but the parameter can be influenced. Both negatively, for example by temperature and humidity fluctuations (fire is very damaging), light and chemical exposition. Both positively, and this is what we try to do with preventive conservation.

[theextremebudgeter]

As a fellow Catholic, I feel the same. The shroud is such an amazing artefact whether relating to Jesus or not. I would be equally amazed to find out it was produced by artificial means as the extent of the forgery would be so incredibly sophisticated and well thought out.

[danijeljovic]

I'm sceptical of the shroud myself and I haven't watched the whole video yet but I already left a like just because of your honest disclaimer at the start about your own potential biases. I have a lot of respect for such honesty. It's the first time I actually believe that a youtuber really just wants to learn more about a topic and share it even if it doesn't align with their personal beliefs

[Areonas]

Metatron is one of my favorite YouTubers!

[williamberven-phig]

Agnostic here. No "dog in this fight" but if genuine, the most amazing aspect of the shroud would be that we have a photograph of Jesus. Pretty cool, no?

[beebarfthebard]

I believe it's real, but it's not my salvation. If it turns out fake, it isn't going to change my mind on who my savior is.

[harolddoe]

In 1978, my physics instructor was one of the key players on STURP, John Jackson. He gave us a pretty good lecture on his return from Italy including his own slide show. The 3 key findings that stuck with me are the 3D information in the image, the presence of blood, and the absence of paint or any other substance to make the image. As Capt Jackson would say to us, if it isn't the burial cloth of Christ then we have a much bigger mystery.

[slickbomb]

I spit my water when you flinched at the broken noodles...hahahahaha