Sony ZV-E10 II vs Sony a6700

SUPPORT MY CHANNEL WITH MY LUT:

All my sound design was using:

Thank you for watching my video. YOU make these videos happen from your support so please like, share and subscribe if you already haven't.

MAIN CAMERAS:

SECONDARY CAMERAS:

=============================

Film Making GEAR

=============================

LIGHTING:


=============================

APS-C Kit:

=============================

Full Frame Kit:

=============================

Sound Studio Set up:

Outdoor Set Up:
=============================

DISCLAIMER:

=============================

Companies send me products to review and they by all means do not tell me to say anything about it being a positive or negative review. I review all products with my own personal opinion. If a video is ever sponsored I will make it clear.



Affiliate Links:

=============================

Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means, at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a purchase.

[fzgopjt]

I think a ZV-E10 II is a heavily crippled camera which suitable only for begginer vloggers who are swithching from the smartphone to a real camera. Yes, you have here many features beyond the smartphones, but definitedly if you want to take good photos in many situations, the lack of EVF, the lack of IBIS and also ergonomics and dials, etc. really worth the additional 400 bucks for buying the a6700

[TheJohnArmless]

I own the ZV-E10 MK1 and the a6700, and I’ve got to tell you, I used to love the ZV-E10, but when I got my hands on the a6700, I just loved it. If you have the money, it is totally worth it to buy the a6700. However, if you are a beginner, I think the ZV-E10 is a fantastic camera to start with.

[arrows.digital]

Many bloggers seem to defend Sony products, even when they have flaws. I suspect Sony pays bloggers a lot. The ZV-E10 II camera is too expensive. It lacks in-body stabilization. The good stabilization only works with Sony lenses, which are pricey. This makes the ZV-E10 II not a budget-friendly option anymore

[dinismk]

3:56 what lens you used to capture the camera? Focal distance is wide and aperture is fast. Looks great 🔥

[MikePlayDrums]

Legit question…if I’m using the ZV-E10 II as a B Cam on a gimbal or a tripod does it work? Or I should I go with the a6700?

[akshaykumar_r]

5:57 Out of all the reviewers I've seen mention the electronic shutter, only you mentioned the flickering! Boy am I glad I came across your review before going for the buy, or I'd be regretting it later! 🤣

[marxygaming]

planning to buy the zve10-ii. and about that banding, what can i do about it? what camera setting would i need to do when taking photos? TIA

[Soundwave]

10:07 my old Sony a700 from 2011 already does that, i was very disappointed when i got an a77II and later a7III that it didnt rotate anymore :/ I really hope all those new Features will also make it to "older" cameras like a7cII/r, a7rV, a7IV etc but looking at Sonys track record of firmware updates i probably expect too much

[frankfeng]

The correct launch price for ZV-E10ii under the current spec should have been $850, although I still think they intentionally cut too many corners that won't necessarily save them much cost.

[sumangoswami]

Is there any difference in both camera's 4k footage in terms of sharpness? and also does electronic shutter effect in video, specifically low light (like will I get banding in videos)?

[kochar]

I own Sony ZVE10 original and its great. I wanted to buy mark II. But I am very upset, that they have removed mechanical shutter! Why? I wanted to use it on videos and for photos. Is it really such big problem for photos with Sony ZVE10 mark II without mechanical shutter?

[OmarKhaki]

Hello everyone
I wonder why no one is talking about which camera is best for live streaming? I think many people use system cameras for live streaming, but it seems that not many people are interested in talking about how the cameras handle live streaming.

[edwardnoble]

The lack of IBIS, EVF, physical shutter and AI chip on the ZV-E10II are pretty big omissions, but it's also worth considering the weight because the A6700 weighs pretty much the same as the full frame A7C range.

[chronicandironic]

I have the ZV-E10 mk1. The lack of view finding is such a pain. The camera only does good in light and you can’t see the damn screen in the light

[TexpatOTG]

I just do YouTube vids and make virtually no money doing it. So being a hobby video creator, the ZVE10 II was my upgrade plan. When it came out at $1000+ USD, I decided to buy either an a6400 or ZVE10 -- prices are a little wonky here in Phillipines, so just depends on which one is the best deal. Even 2nd-hand is OK. Good show as always ... Cheers

[JJARCHIE]

for table top content creator and gimbal users this is a slam dunk, esp with the better heat thermal ( which was confusing, i thought the a6700 lasted the same )

[DatingDilemmaBreakdown]

I think you didn't mention it. ZV-E10 II has a tally light I think, which is nice. I'm still undecided which one to get, but I feel the A6700 is the better choice. There seem to be used ones on the market, fairly new, barely 50$ more than the ZV-E10 II

[nightdonutstudio]

No ibis pretty much mean I can not use this camera for b roll shot. It is a tripod only camera for me. Very limited.

[coryosborne]

I was worried that I might have buyers remorse when they initially announced the mark II-having just upgraded to the 67000 from the mark I.. After seeing the recent spate of reviews, I feel that I made the right choice. Absolutely LOVE the 6700- and I don't think I could go back to not having viewfinder.

[cubdukat]

I considered this over the A6700…until I saw it only has a digital shutter. I use my camera primarily for still photography, and having to deal with rolling shutter in stills is a total non-starter.