Sedevacantism Debate: Are John XXIII Through Francis True Popes? Jeff Cassman Vs Br. Peter Dimond

preview_player
Показать описание
Jeff Cassman will take the affirmative, Bro. Peter Dimond, the negative. Debate format and bio's below.

DEBATE FORMAT

Opening Statements 10 Min each
5 min Response each
Cross Examination 10 Min Each
Cross Examination 10 Min Each
2 Min break
5 Min Response Each
Cross Examination 10 Min Each
Cross Examination 7 Min Each
Closing Statement 5 Min each

OUR COMMUNITY

Special thanks to all our supporters for your continued support! You don't have to give anything, yet you do. THANK YOU!

SPONSORS

MERCH

SOCIAL

Jeff Cassman is a former Air Force Intelligence Analyst and a predictive behavioral modeling expert for an ad agency in Nashville, TN. He’s a cradle Catholic and first attended a traditionalLatin Mass in 2000. He later studied theology at Holy Apostles College in Connecticut.
Jeff is a co-founder of Catholic Men of America, our country’s only national professional business fraternity for Catholic men. He is a gentleman farmer, raising pigs, rabbits, chicken and quail and has designed and built aquaponic greenhouse growing environments for tilapia and organic produce. Jeff has been married to his high school sweetheart, Sarah for 28 years and they have homeschooled their 14 children (11 boys and three girls), now ages 3 to 26. In his spare time,Jeff enjoys eating and sleeping.

00:00 Start
1:52 Intro
2:40 Jeff Cassman opening statement
12:50 Br. Peter Dimond opening statement
22:30 Jeff Cassman response
27:25 Br. Peter Dimond response
32:37 Cassman’s Cross-Examination of Dimond
43:29 Dimond’s Cross-Examination of Cassman
53:39 Cassman’s 2nd Cross-Examination of Dimond
1:03:48 Dimond’s 2nd Cross-Examination of Cassman
1:21:12 Jeff Cassman 2nd response
1:26:10 Br. Peter Dimond 2nd response
1:31:12 Cassman’s 3rd Cross-Examination of Dimond
1:41:30 Dimond’s 3rd Cross-Examination of Cassman
1:51:34 Cassman’s 4th Cross-Examination of Dimond
1:58:52 Dimond’s 4th Cross-Examination of Cassman
2:06:03 Jeff Cassman closing statement
2:10:40 Br. Peter Dimond closing statement
2:15:20 Wrap-up
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Imagine, as a Catholic, being asked if the pope professes the true faith. And you can't answer.

jdk
Автор

As an outside observer non-Catholic, Dimond was way more convincing. This surprised me given all the slander against him I've seen on YouTube.

cinnabun
Автор

When I witness a murder take place in broad daylight, I don't need the authorities to let me know who the murderer is. I know it because I have seen it and heard it from the beginning. Official denouncements and penalties come later from the authorities when they finally arrest the criminal and figure it out.

paxsincera
Автор

Cassman was DESTROYED. The idea that you can't "know" if there is a heresy being said unless there is a formal authority stating it, this is absolutely nuts and absurd.

ilyamuromets
Автор

What a great debate! Very respectful and intelligent. Don’t take this down. Catholics need these kind of conversations. Thanks Matt !

mirandatarbox
Автор

Over the last 35 years I've heard the words "in the spirit of Vatican 2" many times. I never heard a priest or Catholic educator say the words "in the spirit of Florence". Something is wrong.

jdk
Автор

Bro. Dimond is very prepared. It is to hard for the other debater to defend any of the post conciliar Popes. Bro. Dimond uses their own words to indict them. Great debate, great fun. Thank you!

edwarddeverna
Автор

Bro Peter Dimond did well; he expressed his position clearly, logically, and well documented.

reyreyes
Автор

Thanks for bringing Br. Dimond on. Been waiting for a little debate action with him. I look forward to some more!

stephanustlm
Автор

This debate format was excellent. Would like to see more sede vs non-sede debates.

KenpoDobbs
Автор

I'm listening carefully and I have a great respect for Jeff, but I must admit that Bro. Peter Dimond got a interesting point and all what he had said until now it's totally correct and well funded. 🙏🙏🙏

luisrodnav
Автор

Peter diamond won so thoroughly that people are begging for the video to be deleted.

Ponder_the_Cross
Автор

I am honestly shocked how reasonable and well researched Brother Dimond was. He won.

christisking
Автор

Trent Horn is afraid of debating Brother Peter directly.

DecadesDaily
Автор

Just the fact that this conversation is taking place is saying a lot about the emergency that is on going in the church. Questions are similar to "what is a woman?" A: "I am not a doctor."😔

lovesrlady
Автор

Bro. Dimond wiped the floor with him. It was a total rout.

Brother_Jack
Автор

Bro. Peter clearly won this debate. Anyone who says otherwise is intellectually dishonest. It doesn’t necessarily mean sedevacantism is triumphant, but it does mean it was clearly better presented than the non-sedevacantist position.

Deus-Vult-AMDG
Автор

Sorry to say, but I found Jeff Cassman's defense of Francis and the Vatican offensive. Br. Peter Dimond was on point and above reproach.

lachesisatropos
Автор

"Why are you interrupting me? I gave you respect?"
Cassman ten minutes earlier: "Well if you had ACTUALLY read so and so author" (and be turned out to be incredibly wrong and Dimond right).

jayjat-dfsl
Автор

Just to be clear the Jews covenant has been absolutely revoked. Salvation ONLY comes through Jesus and His Church. Amazing this would be “controversial” in our time.

chaunceyhart