Clear evidence for Young Earth Creation: can scientists accept it?

In this clip from our sequel "Mountains After the Flood", geologists John Whitmore and Andrew Snelling talk with Del Tackett about the importance of their research project in the Grand Canyon. They discuss creation science and why it provides answers to evidence not found in the conventional scientific paradigm. Watch the entire film to see the fascinating results of their research.

Film Synopsis:
What if creation scientists suddenly discovered amazing new evidence supporting the events of Genesis? What if you could watch that discovery? 𝘔𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘈𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘍𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥 follows Dr. Del Tackett as he joins a team of creation scientists who discover amazing new evidence for a recent global Flood. You’ll stare up at folded rock layers, peer into microscopes, climb high mountains, and fly over the Grand Canyon. By the time the journey is over, you’ll have a completely new understanding of what the Flood did to create the world we live in today.

Andrew Snelling, PhD is Director of Research for @answersingenesis
John Whitmore, PhD is Professor of Geology at @cedarvilleuniversity
Del Tackett, DM created the Truth Project in 2005 with @focusonthefamily

#bible #creation #genesis #youngearth #science #christianity

[umvhu]

"All are called, few are chosen" I've probably got the wording wrong, but you know what I mean. Some people will refuse to see the evidence no matter how it is presented, they reject Christ no matter what.

[GammingDay]

I live a pretty busy and somewhat distracted life, having small kids. But visiting this amazing subject, occasionally seeing what you guys are doing in this realm just lifts my heart and fills me with wonder in this cynical and jaded culture we endure.

[roselynn]

The glory of God shines throughout His creation!

[michaelstrauss]

Genesis IS history, Genesis IS HIS STORY and Genesis is revelation.

[SalvableRuin]

This is exactly why science, theoretically, is supposed to allow all viewpoints. It allows for a broader range of considerations and has more people looking for more kinds of evidence in more places.

[jonathankim]

2:24 - And he just said, "Nope, those can’t be ooids. 'Those aren’t ooids." And wanted to drop the subject almost immediately.
I pressed him on it a little bit, but he didn’t want to go any further on it.

That’s what happens when someone is captive in a paradigm.
"They don’t want to see any evidence that’s contrary to that paradigm"

Exactly. When there's anything that proves wrong their belief that their brains are a product of random evolution of stardust by chance over millions of years, they don't want to accept them. 😂😂
Amazing how stubbornly they'll remain in their belief in order to stick to their Atheism because they hate God..

[markoshun]

It seems a bit ironic for him to say other scientists are 'stuck in their paradigm'. Here they start with the understanding that world is only thousands of years old and are looking for evidence of that.
But even as a non geologist, I can understand that sandstone was formed at the bottom of bodies of water, so finding it's made up of water worn granules seems completely expected. How does this lead to the conclusion the grand canyon is only 6000 years old?

[newcreationinchrist]

Amen 🙌🙌🙌 God's word always proves true

[tomvalpo]

My son graduated from Cedarville in '22. What a great institution, top to bottom. Thank you for coming. 😊

[BlueEyedColonizer]

Guys, im ready for a two hour video on this stuff please. 🙏

[civilization]

Evo's keep calling their theories "settled science". And then every decade or two, they revise their theories and once again insist that NOW it is settled science.

[robertmize]

I'm very grateful, gentlemen. He is a Mighty God who speaks to His children.

[karenduncan]

Fascinating stuff. I look forward to seeing the whole film.

[Jwarrior]

Thank you but am a little lost there...i may hv missed the main how does the presence of ooids prove a young earth?

[ConservativeMirror]

At 2:40 they seem to complain about having a paradigm, like it's a bad thing, and then immediately start talking about how they are "creation scientists, " not merely "scientists, " and how they "have a different way of looking at things" and they "think the layers were laid down during the flood." Isn't that a paradigm?

[stevennortje]

Here in South Africa we also have similar rock formation. There is a whole driveway going thru this place called Meiringspoort. If you ever have the opportunity this will be well worth the trip.

[truthgiver]

If you can prove it then science will accept it the problem is you can't actually prove it and pseudo science just wont crack it

[Greenereefs]

Has this been peer reviewed? Can it be disproved? If not it’s not evidence?

[jackjones]

Yet another fascinating SCIENTIFIC example supporting God's Word.

[ithasbeenwritten]

I love it! Ooids…
word of the month. 😂
Thank you guys. I love your stuff so very much