SCIENCE confirms a YOUNG earth

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Anomalocaris canadensis was a 60-centimetre-long arthropod (the group of animals that includes insects, spiders, crabs and scorpions), making it one of the largest animals to live during the Cambrian period which lasted from 541 million to about 484 million years ago

gkyrmpz
Автор

Scientific evidence rules out a young Earth

markheithaus
Автор

"So many evidences"...that's easily said. Funny how you don't quote any of them.

joshuakohlmann
Автор

What evidence? You did not give any evidence for a young earth. You justed stated that science proves a young earth but gave no evidence.

mewkaryote
Автор

Blessings to you! Thank you for sharing God's truth.

roberta
Автор

Institute for Creation Research. TRUTH tellers! Nevertheless, GOD!

lynnlink
Автор

That's just the way it is? That's a very solid, and convincing statement. How could you possibly doubt it? 😏🤭😂🤣

PortmanRd
Автор

Amen ICR!!! 😊✝️🙏
The Lord protect and bless you abundantly

newcreationinchrist
Автор

“Santa Claus is real.”
“How do you know?”
“Evidence supports it.”
“Oh, can you show me the evidence?”
“No.”

Ethan-hkse
Автор

"There's so many evidences..."
I'm a YEC. But you only gave the genealogies. But the title isn''t "Bible confirms a young earth", it's "Science confirms a young earth." This is just clickbait.

davidrobinson
Автор

So not true... as a science follower science disagrees with almost the entire creation story

eitancahlon
Автор

There is no evidence for a young earth. You simply lie.

Alex-ysdd
Автор

All he said is that science backs up YEC. He gave absolutely no evidence that support is clam. He just said it is so therefore it is. 😂

williamsthebest
Автор

I am a Christian, but I am more of the old earth creationist. The bible never says the earth was 6000 years old. The book of Genesis did say the 6 days of creation, but those are metamorphic days, not literal days. I don't see any evidence in this video.

ninjab.
Автор

No, it doesn't. It does quite the opposite, in fact.

jurassicsmackdown
Автор

Why does it say adam is the first man but says he went to other tribes to find a wife.. the scripture is a joke and is just a family tree for that family. Does not make the book holy it makes it a fable.

jamesbean
Автор

His "Knowledge" of any of these scientific terms is only skin deep.

stephen
Автор

Show your evidence. Otherwise, it’s just an opinion. Sheesh. Saying “it is”
with a smile doesn’t make it true.

elmoreglidingclub
Автор

This is wrong, scientific evidence points to an old earth, I'm an old earth creationist, the "days" of Genesis 1 are not 24-hour days from a human point-of-view and from earth’s frame of reference, they're divine "days" from God's perspective of time and from God's frame of reference, 2 Peter 3:8 says "Dearly beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord, as a thousand years, and a thousand years as a day" and Psalms 90:4 says "For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday when it is past, or as a watch in the night" these figurative verses convey the idea that God has a vastly different perspective of time compared to our human perspective of time, God transcends earthly constraints of time, the Bible nowhere says " the Earth is 6000 years old".

kingofthemultiverse
Автор

The 6k yrs from Adam in Garden watered by a river Eden? But time from man and earth watered by a mist is Unspecified
Earth not Eden
Man in Gen1 not Adam in Gen2... man in Gen1 told he may eat everything without restriction but Adam was restricted to not eat tree of knowledge of good and evil
Great confusion comes by equating Gen1&Gen2 earth not Eden Man in Gen1 given dominion and told replenish Adam in Gen2 told tend garden eden

otisarmyalso