Why Does the US Navy Hate its Littoral Combat Ships

preview_player
Показать описание
The Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is a fast, agile, mission-focused platform designed to operate in near-shore settings. The LCS is capable of supporting maritime security, sea control, and deterrence. Moreover, the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) is a class of Small Surface Combatants armed with capabilities focused on defeating global challenges in the littorals. In addition, LCS is designed to provide joint force access in the littorals. Ships in this class can operate independently or in high-threat environments as part of a networked battle force that includes larger, multi-mission surface combatants.

All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.

Subscribe Now :
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Another major problem is that the navy isn't qualified to maintain many of the ships systems. Instead private contractors must be flown across the world to perform maintenance duties that on any other ship would be done in house. This is because although the navy owns the ships and paid for the development of the technology the contractors retain the knowledge as their intellectual property. So navy personnel aren't allowed to know how the systems actually work. Also the ships were supposed to require less crew than normal. This also turned out to be false although we paid more upfront for this "feature" . So we paid more for the ships, more for the upkeep and more to man them. All of these problems were obvious from the start and anyone who helped push this program should be arrested as traitors and held accountable. The contractors and the navy personnel robbed the tax payers and they did it on purpose

charlesvaughan
Автор

Title should had instead been "Why Does the US Navy Hate its Little Crappy Ships"

spacecraftcarrier
Автор

Because they are breaking. Aluminum can't handle the load and twisting . And they aren't armed worth a damn .

RATTLR
Автор

Those ships are a good idea but made with aluminum instead of steel and they are cracking up with stress fractures. Yes, the Navy has a crack problem with these.

julianjeffbissette
Автор

Littoral combat ships are for shallow water, perfect for the coast guard and that's who I would give it to!

craig
Автор

I did foundation machining on the Independence LCS’s for 4.5 years. Drive trains, engines, gear boxes, thrusters, sea ram, gun mounts….etc. etc. The aluminum is so unstable that when using a surface mounted milling machine it can barely operate without vibration. It came as no surprise to me when cracks started becoming a problem after being used in the open seas. Engineers did not like or want to hear of the consistent machining issues and challenges. It truly a Little Crappy Ship.

John-mupy
Автор

I love when the hired narrators don't care enough to correct grammatic errors

GodWentAFK
Автор

Overpriced? Inefficient? Incapable? Pick your poison.

KondorDCS
Автор

These have been a albatross around the Navy’s neck. What a stupid idea! No CIWS, no 5” gun, no Aegis, no ASW module. What is this aluminum hunk of junk good for. Who’s idea was this?

thomasfx
Автор

The literal combat ships are literally useless.

definitelyfrank
Автор

Like the F35 designed to do everything but not well at all.

eleventy-seven
Автор

When you’re talking about more than one dollar, it’s DOLLARS.

bryanpelton
Автор

It would be a perfect choice for some smaller navies to defend their coasts with these. But then again these lcs would be too expensive for smaller navies.

Bohemian
Автор

Simple efficient cheap idea suddenly turned into useless money drain. Magic!

faris.Djunaidi
Автор

Beautiful ships but kinda useless. What a waste of money

christianjunhoffman
Автор

If a shop can't defend itself properly, then it becomes a liability.

Randallsixx
Автор

2:18 Hmm 🤔… “can’t defend itself from anti-ship missiles” 3 seconds later “armament includes Rolling Airframe Missiles…” Im confused now

anonymouse
Автор

The plural of ‘dollar’ is dollars. Maybe not so much AI next time.

thomasfx
Автор

Why not ask the Australian guys that sold us on them? Im pretty sure they’re being sued or something similar

doggodango
Автор

If they only decided to upgrade those decommissioned Ticonderoga class warship that would have made more sense and maybe a bit time and cost saving

christianjunhoffman