Jordan Peterson about a very Interesting RAT Experiment! #shorts

It reveals how Matt Par runs 9 different YouTube niche channels without even showing his face.

Full Video Link:
--------------------------
--------------------------

Follow us on Instagram to get motivated there:
Subscribe for more!
#shorts #motivation
---------------------------
--------------------------

- Finding Video Editor for Your Channel? We have our Team! Contact on the Above Email! We can produce the Video you want!
--------------------------
- Buy Jordan Peterson Books:
---------------------------
For USA people:
---------------------------

---------------------------
For UK people:
---------------------------

--------------------------
For Canadian people:
---------------------------

---------------------------
For Indian people:
---------------------------

--------------------------
--------------------------
(These are affiliate links, so we might earn some commissions from your purchase without any extra charges to you! Thank You in advance. You are awesome!)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It reveals how Matt Par runs 9 different YouTube niche channels without even showing his face.

[laurabarber]

Finish his comment!!! The the big rat MUST let the small rat win- or the small rat Wii NOT came back to play! It's about maintaining balance in the relationship!💝😎💝

[GabiKravMaga]

The next statement is far more important!
It reverses whats understood from this short.
Its about balancing the the power dynamic, the big rat must let the small one win as well if he wont the small one wont come back

[christophersnedeker]

Didn't go to the end he's supposed to say the big rat has to let the little rat win so he doesn't stop wanting to play.

[cdiers]

how do you clip something and miss the whole point

[michaelweston]

In other words the large voiceless majority will rise up

[ThePojengsidur]

Jaak Panksepp if anyone is interested.

[SierraFarted]

I had three pet rats, and my littlest runt was the one obviously in charge of the two much bigger rats. Sometimes it’s mindset, not physical strength.

[steelcom]

Peterson and his studies. If you ever look them up you will be shocked at how poorly run they are. The one on quitting smoking using psilocybin he claimed proved mystical experiences exist. First of all it was not a Randomized, Double-Blind study. Secondly it had only 15 subjects where a true study requires minimum 100, and there was no Control Group. Any scientist that conluded such nonsense or even referred to such a spurious study as legitimate would likely lose his job. Good thing Peterson doesn't have one.

[alexchudilovski]

I see the point.

Would you tell a big rat that a small rat is at liberty to pose a question.

[aouna]

I don’t understand
Edit: is he referring to Tom and jerry?

[drew]

Lmao. This is why people NEED to first get a basic context of philosophy and philosophical thinking and logical fallacies before listening to JP.
If you had studied Kant, Hegel, Plato, Descartes before JP he wouldn’t be impressive but more importantly you would have the ABILITY to recognize logical errors (sentences which sound true but ain’t).
Like his blathering that human ethics are based on “circuitry” from a rats brain. Omg just so many problems with that statement I can’t even bother to list them.
You reading this- I LITERALLY PROMISE YOU ABSOLUTELY that if you give two of the BIG philosophers of all time a good read it will blow him out of the water and you’ll never go back.
He has AMAZING rhetorical skills and sounds great, could sell shit to an asshole, but his logic fails like dominoes.