Bart Ehrman on the Deity of Christ

preview_player
Показать описание
Looked at Bart Ehrman’s ignorance of the NT’s witness to Jesus as Y--H.

For James White's political content, click here:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Pray for Bart Erhman, that our Lord would have mercy on him. It doesn't matter how much or how knowledgeable Bart is on the scriptures, he needs God to open his heart to the gospel.

youvasquez
Автор

Thank you, Dr. White for your consistent defense of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ!!!!

KalliBella
Автор

Great explanation! Thank you Dr White.

dylanmilks
Автор

For 2:30
John 12:41
Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus' glory( in Isaiah 6) and spoke about him.

John 8:58
"I tell you the truth, " Jesus answered, "before Abraham was born, I am!"

ChandraAnandInChrist
Автор

Erhman knows what the evidence is and what it shows - and yet he willfully (just like the religious leaders in Jesus' day did) continues to double down on his refusal to acknowledge that. After all, he's got his book deals to protect so he can keep the money flowing.

SAOProductions
Автор

A simple answer: "But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived" (2 Tim 3:13).

nobody
Автор

Erhman is nothing more than a troll at this point. He knows what is taught and what Scripture is clear on. Please, PLEASE Dr. White, challenge him to debate the subject on the deity of Christ! He seems so proud of his last debate with you. Go get him! Solus Christus forever.

joshhigdon
Автор

"He's tilting at windmills" - I'd not heard this phrase/terminology before but going to try to use it from now on & see if anyone gives me a blank look, then reaches for their phone to g00gle it
....like I did! 🤔🤷‍♀️🤦‍♀️
Am i correct in understanding that it has a slightly similar meaning to 'making a straw man'? ie Figuratively attacking/destroying something that is imaginary/not reality.

iwonder
Автор

Gotta love Cosby sweater Augustinian Calvinist hour. It’s the satirical hero we don’t deserve.

tellmethetruth
Автор

Yeah I watch a couple debates with Bart Ehrman and Daniel B Wallace. And I seen that Bart Ehrman is not 100% true to the Greek text of the new testament. But Daniel B Wllace true to the Greek text. Now my question is this. How can Bart Ehrman call himself a scholar if he does not stay true to the Greek text to the best of his ability? That really irritates me that people do that. They put themselves out there as a expert on a subject matter. When in reality they are a joke! Geesh! Yes it does really irritate me!!!!

partoftheway
Автор

Great video as always. Can anyone direct me to a good discussion on the use of the word kyrios. I know it’s used as lord or master but also as LORD Yahweh but how does one know when it is used as one or the other?

Sean-D-B
Автор

Another attack on Jesus Christ. I grow weary in this battle, but I continue.

davidbalicki
Автор

..remembering the Andy Griffith episode..pointing to the text " It's right there!" Thanks for all you do🙏

sparker
Автор

A voice of one calling: “In the wilderness prepare the way for the LORD; make straight in the desert a highway for our God. (Isaiah 40:3)

If the voice in the wilderness is " John the Baptist", . Whose way John is preparing ?
It's LORD ( YHWH) in the Tanakh

But John the Baptist, Applies to Jesus .
So, the Jesus is YHWH .

“I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me comes one who is more powerful than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.
(Mattew 3:11)

Akhil_Chilukapati
Автор

B. B. Warfield on the 'Trinity" concerning Matthew 28:19 in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: This is a direct ascription to Yahweh, the God of Israel, of a threefold personality, and is therewith the direct enunciation of the doctrine of the Trinity. We are not witnessing here the birth of the doctrine of the Trinity; that is presupposed. What we are witnessing is the authoritative announcement of the Trinity as the God of Christianity by its Founder, in one of the most solemn of His recorded declarations. Israel had worshipped the one only true God under the Name of Yahweh; Christians are to worship the same one only and true God under the Name of "the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost." This is the distinguishing characteristic of Christians; and that is as much as to say that the doctrine of the Trinity is, according to our Lord's own apprehension of it, the distinctive mark of the religion which He founded.

fredrolinners
Автор

How this disingenuous charlatan was awarded a PhD from Princeton is baffling. Edwards and Warfield must be turning in their graves.

AndalusianIrish
Автор

Pray for Bart Ehrman and his salvation. He has been blinded by the enemy because of his pride. He is lost. He is now headed for eternal separation from God!

ТарасЗагайкевич
Автор

what is the software you're using there? for the greek, as well as the manuscript references?

joshuaandersen
Автор

You'd think if yahweh himself had become a man and walked on the earth, the early Christians would maybe mention it a few more times? Yet handful of references you can point to are dubious at best, often with manuscript variations that can change the meaning.

If they really believed that they were witnessing something as incredible as the God of the universe walking on the earth as a man, you'd think they would talk about it a little bit more. Makes me a bit suspicious.

missaleromanum
Автор

So our Heavenly Father cannot be glorified through His son without His son being Our Heavenly Father? Or a son of God cannot demonstrate glory without that son being God himself? What a joke! God in flesh, yes, God as flesh, no!! God was in Christ, God was not Christ. No need for Paul by inspiration to say God was in Christ if Christ was actually God himself, that would be redundant and as foolish as trinitarianism.

briankregg
welcome to shbcf.ru