Mid-Acts dispensationalist heresy. A question they can’t answer properly.

[tedeskidrums]

The criticizers use the scripture Hebrews 13:8 - "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and forever", yet they don't study deep enough, nor rightly divide deep enough, to understand that this scripture is talk about Jesus Christ in his deity, but that He works through progressive revelation. In short, they basically believe tradition because it's easier to accept a lie that has been dressed up to look and sound like the truth than to actually invest the time and effort through prayer and diligent study of the Bible to find out; not to mention the use of all the newer sloppier translations that are definitely inspired by Satan. I'm not saying that the KJV is 100% accurate, but I believe it is the closest to 100% accurate that we have!

[mysterygirl]

Mid acts dispensationalism is the only thing that makes sense to me

[coolchamp]

Let's look at gal. 1:8
But though we (literally anyone including Paul), or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you (the galatians) than that which we (Paul, Titus, barnabas, not Peter nor the 12 because it was Paul forming gentile churches) have preached unto you (galatians), let him be accursed.

Gospel simply means "good news". When you see the same word in the bible, do not assume it means the same thing, look at the context defining that word in a sentence. Do you think anytime the bible mentions baptism it's talking about water baptism? No (matt. 3:11-12, baptism into Moses, baptism into Christ's death (Luke 12:50, rom 6), etc).

Jesus was not accursed. Jesus gave a new revelation. He was working through the law in his earthly ministry and preaching faith in his name. He did that to set up an earthly kingdom for his people, Israel so that they could be a channel of blessing to the world. Since Israel rejected him, Stephens death being the last straw, God concluded Israel in blindness and declared everyone (Jews and Gentiles) sinners and by his grace is giving free justification by faith in the finished work of Christ.

God/Jesus's dealing with humanity has changed. Preaching the gospel of the kingdom today is a devilish doctrine because that's not what God is doing today. It has been put on hold. God is working through grace that abounds today and he gave that revelation to Paul. Preaching contrary to that is what makes one accursed.

[jonathanmorgan]

We can answer that..! This is the answer=There different gospels because if you study out what Paul says to what Peter/James/John etc says it's unbelievable the amount of differences there are and not just differences but total opposites/contradictory.Im not going to go into them here but just to say that jesus taught differently to Paul of course because it was Teaching the Jew's only but Paul says he's the apostle to the gentiles, I magnify mine office:He said consider what I say and god will give you understanding etc Remember also now that we don't follow Jesus after the flesh no more(this goes along with what I said before via jesus only teaching Israel)we follow the risen lord who gave Paul new information(Romans to philimon)which is considerable different to the red letters+Peter James etc

[coolchamp]

4:41 this is a cult like mentality in my opinion. A mid acts dispensationalist named Justin Johnson from grace ambassadors, I learnt from him that before I can criticise any denomination I must first understand the doctrine they teach. Secondly, we are to make the word of God our final authority, if people's doctrine do match God's words, avoid them, even if it's Justin Johnson.

You putting out strawmans against mid acts an telling your followers to stay away without judging for themselves if it's right or wrong is cult like.

They have the bible, let them judge for themselves if our doctrine is right or wrong, not you.

[hereticus]

Respectfully, Brother, and I say this gently and graciously, you are playing fast and loose with the Word of God. Here is why I make this claim:

1. @ 1:45 - Paul does NOT put a curse on "anyone who preaches another gospel, " as you say. You even read the words out loud . . . "If any man preach any other gospel UNTO YOU than THAT YE HAVE RECEIVED, let him be accursed." And there are two more "UNTO YOUs" in verse 8. Are you ignoring those? King James folks usually value every word, Brother, so let's not ignore the three times Paul wrote "UNTO YOU" or the fact that he also said, "that YE have received." His curse is upon them who try to preach another gospel unto the Galatians, which Jesus never did. Correct?

And you repeat this error at 3:55. Maybe read the above comment again. : )

2. @ 3:10 "They focus on the Pauline epistles and that's really it." Respectfully, Brother, you are mistaken again. Not to boast, but I know Genesis, Ezekiel, Zechariah and Revelation at least as well as you do. When I teach, every lesson has plenty of verses from OT and NT, gospels and prophets and Revelation. It's all there and it's a wonderful puzzle to try to figure out.

3. @ 3:40 - "Everything in God's word is to us. It is for us." Eh, you are only partly correct, but can we say that in a way that is more precise? It is for us, for education and doctrine and reproof and correction, but it is not all for us to tell us how to live in this life, at this time, in this dispensation. You don't have a blue thread in the bottom of your shirts. You don't have tassels on your shirts. You don't go to Jerusalem three times a year. Your wife didn't stay out of church 33 days for a man child, nor 66 days for a maid child (Lev 12). If you follow Jer 22:3, kings sitting upon the throne of David, riding on chariots and on horses, he and his servants and his people, will NOT enter Jerusalem. BECAUSE THAT IS NOT FOR YOU, NOR TO YOU. Are you going to claim otherwise?

4. And I will say that Gene Kim and Robert Breaker are most definitely NOT mid-Acts dispys. They hate the mid-Acts folks as much as you do. They follow Ruckman completely, and he drew that line in the sand long ago, and none of his folks will cross it, even decades later. They are not mid-Acts, but they may be dispensational, but just Acts 2 dispensational.

Finally, I hope you are not trying to claim or hint that you "follow Jesus, " because you have never followed Jesus a single day in your life. For Thanksgiving, did you invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind, as Jesus said, or did you have your family and friends over, exactly as Jesus said NOT to do? Have you sold all you have and given it to the poor, as Jesus said to do in Luke 18:22? And don't try to get out of it by saying that's not really what he meant, because that's exactly what they did at the end of Acts 2 and Acts 4.

Paul is the preacher, teacher and apostle TO THE GENTILES, (I Tim 2:7) while Jesus was a minister of the circumcision. God gave Paul to direct and teach the church, just like he gave Moses to direct and teach Israel; and just like the vast majority of Israelites wouldn't follow Moses, the vast majority of Christians won't follow Paul.

Grace. : )

[robusc]

KJV, excellent choice :)
Who taught Paul ? Christ.
Gal 2:7 writes :-
Peter - Gospel OF the circumcision.
Paul - Gospel OF the UNcircumcision.
Saved by faith in the death/burial/resurrection of Christ.
Pauls Gospel, 1 Cor 15:1-4 :-
By which also ye are
that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
..
Please list the verses where Peter teaches the same.

[Godisable]

Thank you brother for exposing this cultish doctrinal utter rubbish! It has brought major division in my family. All of God’s word is for our instruction, all of it! I pray that my deluded and brain washed family members will see the truth of the living Word🙏.

[Jorge-spyk]

So, there was only one gospel. Then why did James say, "Jas 2:24 KJV Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Then Paul contradicts James by saying, "Rom 3:28 KJV Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

How can this be?
It can be because because they are both right.
James was speaking of the Jewish church in Jerusalem and Paul was speaking of the body of Christ Church (BOC).
Notice who James was writing to: Jas 1:1 KJV James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.

James was writing to fellow Jews ONLY. He was not writing to the BOC. As a matter of fact, none of the Jewish writers in the New Testament (NT) wrote to the BOC; they always wrote to fellow Jews.
Furthermore, None of them (James, John, Peter, Jude) every said a single world about the BOC, not one word. Why? Because neither they nor their converts were in the BOC.
That's why when the persecution of the Jerusalem church began, (after Stephen was murdered by the Sanhedrin, ) "...they [Jews] who were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching the word to none but unto the Jews only" (Acts 11:19).
Preaching to Jews ONLY! Why?
I though there was a Great Commission to complete; so, why Jews only?
Another good question: Why did the apostles stay in Jerusalem when the persecution began?
Act 8:1 KJV And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.

"...except the apostles." It's really hard to fulfill the Great Commission from Jerusalem!

[kjvuser]

🗣 keep going 💪
Not enough videos exposing this

[andrewclemons]

That's probably the single thing dispensationalists have right is that Paul's letters contain multiple contradictions when compared to the teachings of Jesus in the gospels. From doing away with the law to eating meat sacrificed idols Paul bastardizes the gospel of Jesus Christ in his letters making a religion about some facts about Jesus rather than what Jesus taught which is where the salvation is to be gained. Which is why Jesus says call no man teacher because one is your teacher the Christ.

[coolchamp]

I don't know why people find it strange when we say they are multiple gospels in scriptures.

OK, my question to you is, what gospel did Abraham believe in gal. 3:8? Is that our gospel today that is found in 1 cor. 15:1-4?

What gospel was Jesus preaching in mark. 1:14? Is it the same as 1 cor. 15:1-4? If yes, explain mark. 9:31-32.

[coolchamp]

3:11 who does this? Which mid acts person does this? The whole bible is important for learning. Reading Paul's epistles gives you an idea of what God is doing NOW but reading alone isn't helpful. The 4 gospels are important (though not applicable today) to know who Jesus was and proofs of him being that Christ. The OT is important to know the prophecy of Jesus and the fulfilment. The psalms and proverbs also helpful. Genesis to understand the history of the world. There's many things to learn about the whole bible but salvation today is found the the Pauline epistles.

If you indeed follow the whole bible, are you building an ark? Do you keep the mosaic law? Sabbath? Food laws? Do you offer burnt offerings? It's in the bible, let's follow it all then.

Criticisms against mid acts is never fair. It's alway the same strawman.

[Kev-yykv]

Your right except your unreasearched comments on Jene Kim and Robert breaker, they both teach against the heresy of hyper dispensationalism, get your facts right before rebuking someone

[robusc]

You like using heresy & other nametags to detract from your simple flawed interpretation of Scripture.

[coolchamp]

Do you really follow Jesus in his earthly ministry? You say the whole bible is for us and to us with a serious face but when we put that to the test, I assure you that you'll fail. Either that or you'll be dishonest and pick and choose what you can easily follow and say the bible was being figurative on the doctrines you can't follow.