This Will FIX The Cheating Problem In CS2! 🤭

Welcome to... This Will FIX The Cheating Problem In CS2! 🤭

Have you got a cheater in your games? Did you think it was annoying? Am i better than S1mple? Let me know what you think down below! 👇

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

-Crosshair Code-
CSGO-a2VNp-yZhHn-xM6Dj-8xHEY-NAKLH

[LK]

Why isn't that a solution:
1. Won't work on systems other than windows.
2. Performance/stability issues.
3. Microsoft is onto removing kernel access to this kind of software.
4. Many kernel ac exist, but they still have cheaters.

[somestranger]

Valve is 100% not gonna do a kernel level anti cheat for good reasons.

[Navyseallover]

There’s cheaters in high elo faceit, people buy DMA’s hardware cheats and this needs to be addressed and dealt with

[batuhanalgun]

I almost laugh when you said there is almost no cheaters in faceit. Faceit is also a place where cheaters chill around nearly every game.

[xKrown]

Rule of thumb: if your anticheat is running on a system, it will be bypassed.

Vac AI is the best solution for this. An independent knowledge source that interprets game movements and positions with data that is shown is much more complex than “if (cheating) dont” so its gonna take a bit of time.

I trust valves efforts and see getting rid of spinners and rapid fire as a step forward.

[Helioski]

Absolutely not. Kernel level anti cheat is 100% unnecessary. Do you want the people who can't figure out how to stop cheaters to have full root access? No.

[somecateyelink]

1. Kernel level is hyper-bypassable
2. Knowing valve they might brick a few pcs this way
3. Valve is using a much better stance of not interfering with the player bases’ systems right now
4. There is a ton of cool shit actual working anticheats use to prevent cheating without using anything like this.

Please no! For people that care that much faceit is a great option, just not for the average player.

[Somedrumsbeats]

Kernel-level anticheat software poses risks to security, privacy, and system stability by granting deep access :D No!! thx^^

[khebre]

Some people in the comment section are kinda misinforming others so let me tell you few things
1.Valve will not do Kernal AC because they respect players privacy
2.Kernal AC is not meant to stop cheating permanently, its supposed to reduce it while detecting cheats faster
3. No. VAC Ai is horrible

[nicolasdesenvolvedor]

DONT DO IT BRO PLEASE NO KERNEL ANTI CHEAT IT WILL NOT WORK ON LINUX ANYMORE

[juliemittel]

the problem with kernel-level anticheat is that they will either completely bork your game (not because you got banned, but because it's not working right) or it'll be used to scrape data (because lets be real, why wouldn't valve want more cash?)

[CSFan]

Agree with the last thing for sure. It’s time for valve to wake up! 😅

[velja]

cheaters would be laughing with their DMA cheats.

[Origin-wcbe]

Bro just solved CS2's biggest problem💀!
Next time he will solve world hunger🗿

[IronFE]

Wow, giving Valve the highest level of permission on your computer sure is the best way to stop some online cheaters. Way to go, Python!

[raid]

kernel level anticheat is like having a cop in ur house 24/7 anywhere u go to make sure u dont do any crime… absolutely ridiculous in my opinion

[yihecao]

Battleye is kernel level and almost every game that use it have a cheater problem.

[MrVectorr]

I miss the overwatch mode, they didn't have to remove it, at least they would have changed some things

[BarınGüzeldemirci]

Kernel Level Anti Cheat is not a great thing, they should make better AI for VAC and bring back the Overwatch.

[angellotomic]

If they wanted to solve the problem, they could, but they don't want to because they would lose a lot of money. They regularly ban cheaters, but very slowly—it can take months before they catch or ban them. However, the main issue arises when cheaters return with new accounts that, of course, they paid Valve for, and the cycle continues endlessly, with money flowing in. There's an interesting trick to improve banning, which is for the server to automatically take a screenshot of every player's screen at a certain moment (this existed in version 1.6 on a server in Serbia where I was an admin). This allows you to clearly see if someone has wallhacks, although it doesn't reveal if they are using some other 'assistive tool.'