Sola Scriptura Refuted

preview_player
Показать описание
Protestant Vs Orthodox Debate: Is Sola Scriptura True? Jay Dyer Vs Pedro
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Pedro tried lol. God bless him to come to the True Church ☦️☦️☦️

blockpartyvintage
Автор

I can see why some people are so turned off by Jay’s personality—we’ve all got types that crawl under our skin, and he has a very polarizing presence about him (love him or hate him kinda thing)—but, being someone who’s been called a bit intense a few times or even a bit overbearing in heated argumentation myself, I gotta feel bad for the dude defending the Reformed position here. Like, wow, that was kinda a slaughter bro ngl

Truly.He.is.risen.
Автор

Even Luther didn't believe in Sola scriptura

SonofTiamat
Автор

It's obvious because all people who proclaim SS have contradicting beliefs among themselves.

But even more so, you can't get Biblical Trinitarianism (IE: Orthodox Trinity) with SS, I think that's an even more powerful refutation of SS!

willtheperson
Автор

They believe sola scriptura but don’t even believe what the scriptures say. Besides, Jesus never intended a book but his church?

nathanh.
Автор

Quicken me after thy lovingkindness; so shall I keep the testimony of thy mouth. For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.
Psalms 119:88-89

danielmorais
Автор

Sola Scriptura is for people who dont know the Eastern Orthodox Theology nor have the curiosity to learn Ancent Faith doctrine and had to choose between Catholicism or Protestantism.

AlphaOmegaTruth
Автор

I know this is an older video, but can anybody tell me what debate this is from please?

joshuachaffin
Автор

what do you mean my bible is the wrong bible?
i have all the correct books
genesis;; exodus;; numbers;; leviticus;; deuteronomy;; Ethiopian enoch;; slavonic enoch;; hebrew enoch;; job;; jonah;; Ezekiel;; zachariah;; habakkuk;; Daniel;; Isaiah;; esther;; the thunder perfect mind;; song of songs;; ecclesiastes;; proverbs;; psalms;; Tao te ching;; zhuangzi;; liezi;; mathew;; mark;; luke;; john;; thomas;; Galatians, Romans,  1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philemon, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians and revelation.

happybeejv
Автор

can you name just *ONE THING* comparable to the Word of our Loving Creator?

tony
Автор

Narcissists always find groupies to do their vids

Maximusinthehouse
Автор

Hebrews not Paul. Maybe Apollos.
Gospel of John : John the Elder or John Eleazor.

bradbrown
Автор

To be fair the Jews look at those books as important books, but not canonical or the word of God. None of the books in the apocrypha were part of the Oral Torah Tradition. Maybe Enoch could have been that is about it.

OvercomeEverythingJosh
Автор

Jude 1:9 yet Michael the archangel *when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses* durst not bring a railing accusation but saith the Lord rebuke thee even more interestingly enough ( *tyin this all together with the body snatching satan satan is also represented as a snake /reptilian* ) *Christ said this about the Pharisees* Matthew 23 then Jesus spake to the multitude and his disciples saying *THE SCRIBES AND THE PHARISEES SIT IN MOSES SEAT* LATER IN THE SAME CHAPTER HE SAYS:: Woe unto you scribes and pharisees hypocrites because ye build the tombs of the prophets and garnish the sepulchers of the righteous and say if we had been in the time of our forefathers *WE WOULD NOT BE PARTAKERS OF THEM IN THE BLOOD OF THE PROPHETS WHEREFORE YE ARE WITNESSES UNTO YOURSELVES THAT YE ARE THE CHILDREN OF THEM WHICH KILLED THE PROPHETS* fill ye up with the measure of your fathers *YE SERPENTS YE VIPERS* how can you escape the damnation of hell long story short: *satan was goin to bodysnatch Moses and pervert the law ..hmm was he successful* ?? judging by Christ's words *YES* as they sit in his (Moses) seat and their vipers* (snakes/reptilians) *that's why Christ/salvation had to be given to the Jews first then the gentiles cus THE REAL truth had to be revealed to them via Christ since truth was thwarted/perverted at Sinai as the word says : John 1:17 King James Version 17 For the law was given by Moses, but grace and *TRUTH* came by Jesus Christ. and why Paul says *He freed us from the law of sin and death* *satan also impersonates or some versions say masquerades an angel of light as well i wonder who that is? it's Heylel or Lucifer* ...that's why the last book is called *revelation*
Revelation 3:1 KJV 3 *And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead*

morganophelia
Автор

Oh man, the only thing one needs to stop believing in sola Scriptura is evidence (of any type) that other forms of revelation are also infallible.

Forget about the word “authority” we’re not talking about that, we can easily accept other authorities, but it’s about INFALLIBILITY.

If scripture is the only INFALLIBLE revelation, then that’s what we mean by sola Scriptura. !!

aldodanieljimenezcardona
Автор

"That which is inspired" should be the final standard. But the litmus test of inspiration should be compatibility with that which is *known* to be inspired.

In other words: If I claim inspiration and say "Let's all worship this head of lettuce by having sex with barnyard animals", you know I'm full of crap, because this contradicts Scripture, which is known to be inspired.

If people reject Scripture and listen to me, then spend 1, 000 years sexin' up a goat until lettuce-themed goat sex becomes" tradition", they're heretics, even though they're heretics for a really long time 😶

If an oral tradition is out of step with written tradition, it's best to stick to the written. Better the God you know than the potential devil you DON'T know. So it's less a case of "Scripture only" than "better safe than sorry".

That's why the Apostles praised the people of Berea as "more noble" than other believers (I'm looking at you, Corinthians) because instead of just accepting the oral tradition the Apostles taught them, "searched the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so". They didn't berate them for rejecting Apostolic authority, they praised them for authenticating it.

In fact they were always saying things like "believe not every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are of God"; or if anyone, even an Apostle or an actual angel preached a different Gospel, let them be accursed. (And if course you only know of various oral traditions *from Scripture*, including the Apostolic.)

If you don't follow the Berean model, which is really the *APOSTOLIC* model, you end up like the RCC. Where you just make up shit and when people say: "That directly contradicts Scripture", you dismiss it with "Scripture must be interpreted in the light of church doctrine" and propagate heresy based on the authority of the Church. Which is crazier than a piss-ant go-cart going around the inside of a Cheerio.

Nunya_Bidness_
Автор

What is the Faith delivered in Jude 3?

bradbrown
Автор

just a thought but given what Christ said to the Pharisees i.e Matthew 15
King James Version
15 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,

2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.

3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;

6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.

9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

*don't you think it is in poor taste to use them to affirm your positions when Christ did not agree with them but rather rebuked them* ?? *so in essence you think Christ said follow their traditions but not them yet how could he have done so when doing so would have led his apostles down the wrong path and been a direct contradiction as He said you worship me in vain* ?? just curious

morganophelia
Автор

What oral traditions are there for us today? Just trying to understand the subject here. Thx.

bradbrown
Автор

Could Scripture be sufficent but not necessary for Salvation?

Meta_Myself