XAVCSI vs ProRes RAW-Sony a7sIII

A short video about the XAVCSI vs ProRes RAW out of Sony a7sIII. Includes the workflow for ProRes RAW in FCPX.
Riverworn - Seeing Clearly
Riverworn - Information Overload
Riverworn - Let's Breathe

00:00 Intro
01:04 ISO test XAVCSI vs ProRes RAW
01:54 Noise pattern of XAVCSI vs ProRes RAW
02:13 ProRes RAW workflow in FCPX
03:39 ProRes RAW super low light grading in FCPX
05:32 Conclusion

[jblaze]

Great review, thank you for making this video!

[VagrantPSN]

You can easily recover 5 stops over in pro res raw with the sony A7SIII. Also you can clean up the noise better than the internal noise reduction. Sony needs to let us turn off or down the internal noise reduction. Only thing bad about pro res raw is storage demands, another piece of equipment to deal with. My problem is no da Vinci resolve support so I won't use raw. S-I is good enough for me right now

[kostasrestas]

Is there any way to see how many minutes left for recording video ?
I mean, if i had 128gb sd card and shoot at xavc s i 10bit 422 at 25fps for example, can i see at display how many minutes i have for recording????
(xavcs i recordable time)

[NafisAhmed]

I think every NLE handles files differently.. but if sony and atomos works together and makes a firmware to correct them we might get more accurate colors out of ninja v. Or, Atomos can work with blackmagic to process to ultimately have both prores raw and braw support for cameras that can support them. On the other hand, I wish we could use Da vinci for color grading as it has far superior color correcting options.

[RMediaPunjab]

Very good review but im still confuse that what is best sony internal recording or prores raw.

[ericsamuels]

what log do you like the most or do you think is the most flexible ?

[Jyibe]

I’m getting really intense noise/grain recording from a7siii to ninja v in all parts of my image, even at base iso. What am I doing wrong?