Based Gavin Ortlund Moment #gigachad #based #religion #solascriptura

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Seriously hes dropping gems with this rebuttal.

lifewasgiventous
Автор

Gavin Ortlund is such a blessing to the Church

ProfYaffle
Автор

Gavin killed it in this debate. Even trent horn agreed and he was the opposition.

illadvized
Автор

Gavin is cooking up a hot dish of biblical truth

ChristAloneNotbyworks
Автор

The Church was either guided by the Holy Spirit or it wasn’t when it declared Jesus’ divinity. No one would dispute that we are required to believe this as Christians. The same principle applies to everything else he listed. It wasn’t tyranny at the Council of Nicea and is not tyranny now.

bcarollo
Автор

I mean, unless all of those things are true…. Then he is refusing to believe the truth.

bcarollo
Автор

Brother Logan. It is quite helpful in understanding the Catholic point of view

Can you please do a rebuttal video to Gavin Ortlunds "Why the reformation was needed"? I would love to see your response!

You do good work!

gardengirlmary
Автор

"You've done well, Lord Vader."

mariomene
Автор

Ortlund articulates this point so well. Don’t bind your conscience to falsehood.

CleavetoAntiquity
Автор

Orthland a real master at it,
Makes me proud to protest

BarkotSentayehu
Автор

The anathemas concern me most with those positions.

chrisazure
Автор

Imagine reading the NT and ECFs and concluding that the Church was meant to be a democracy.

culpepper
Автор

Protestantism isn’t democracy, it’s anarchy. You’re your own Pope and sole interpreter of God’s word.

Also, is Catholicism really a tyranny if it is so easily abandoned?

joelsims
Автор

Agreed but putting it into this sigma male whatever music is silly.

lcs-salam
Автор

Wow disobedience and apostasy so based

midnight_
Автор

It is Jesus’s promise to preserve His Church. You either believe Him, or you’re calling Him a liar. Church’s authority is not like secular authority. The Church basically gave you the Bible, and Jesus gave the Church the authority to interpret it and teach the Gospel truth until the end of time.

cabriniryanvu
Автор

Former protestant here, one thing about Mary I've learned is that, she is without sin thus cannot die. Purgatory ain't a second place to be saved but a place for people who still have hate or envy or pride before death which does not necessary lead them to hell but also stops them from entering heaven. And speaking of icons, the cloth of jesus was needed to be touched by the women to be healed which questions faith ONLY. As James clearly says Faith without works is dead. All this came to me because of sola Scripture. So I can say the holy spirit guided me here. But theres one problem, there are 10, 000 denominations of which all say is inspired by the holy spirit, now all can't be right cause God is one and the Last thing he'll do is confuse us. Praise Jesus brothers and sisters.

ZohanFall
Автор

You can be a Christian without the Bible. That fact by itself proves Sola Scriptura wrong.

If it wasn't true, there would be no Christian for the first 400 years after Christ.

classicalteacher
Автор

Lol this argument doesn't work at all because his idea of "democracy" isn't actually democracy. It is theological relativism and subsequently moral relativism.

This my work against the Roman Catholic church because of their view of the Pope of Rome but wouldn't work against Orthodox Christianity because his idea of tyranny being caused by the need to do certain things is just his standard of what he views as right and wrong.

Who cares what he thinks is right and wrong, is he the pillar and buttress of truth? No the historical and BIBLICAL church is the pillar and butress of truth. And the entire biblical paradigm of the apostolic church does not match up to the protestant churches, it matches up to the Orthodox church.

This isn't a problem of tyranny, it is a problem of pride from his end. Failure to reject his own ideals for Christ's. Sad thing to see.

Now that.. is based.

remymargaux
Автор

I've come to the conclusion, if Peter is the 1st pope, then Paul is the 1st Protestant because of how he single handedly clapped at Peter for being out of line with the gospel. Showing that Peter was fallible..

ChristAloneNotbyworks