Michio Kaku vs. Stephen Hawking: Views on God's Existence.

preview_player
Показать описание
How did Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking differ in their views on the existence of God?

In this video, we explore the differing views of two legendary physicists, Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawking, on one of humanity's oldest questions: the existence of God. Michio Kaku believes that while we cannot prove or disprove God's existence, the beauty and simplicity of the universe hint at a deeper order. On the other hand, Stephen Hawking argued that scientific principles could explain the creation of the universe without the need for a divine creator.

Join us as we break down their perspectives, compare their arguments, and discuss how their views shaped our understanding of science and the cosmos.

Let us know your thoughts in the comments—can science and belief in God coexist, or are they fundamentally opposed? Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more insightful discussions on science, philosophy, and the mysteries of the universe!

#MichioKaku #StephenHawking #ExistenceOfGod #Physics #ScienceVsReligion #Cosmos #StringTheory #BigBang #QuantumMechanics #GodDebate
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Now any questions left why should we not believe in God

fri_
Автор

Stephen Hawking was a REAL Scientist where as Michio Kaku is a POPULAR SCIENCE Entertainer
...Which is ABUNDANTLY CLEAR when you follow both of their contributions (and process).

LrCloud
Автор

I don't believe at all that science and God are mutually exclusive. I'm a Christian and a Creationist. I believe science explains the way the universe works and the real nature of things. I would never deny any scientific fact. But I also believe the universe was created for a unique purpose by an intelligent designer. So i am a Michio Kaku thinker. While science can explain the true nature of how the universe works, it has failed miseraby to provide an explanation of how life can spontaneously appear. That explanation is beyond the scope of science.
It seems to me that the Theory of Evolution has become central to the debate on Creation versus Naturalism. While I accept that we can observe the modificatio n of species over time, I reject the idea that this can provide an explanation for the huge diversity of life on Earth. Sure, we can observe species becoming modified as a response to changing environmental conditions. But we have zero examples of how this can lead to the creation of new Genus, Family, etc. Life forms reproduce after their kind and do not change into new kinds.

stevew
Автор

The fact that there is so much fine tuning as well as the universe had a beginning which necessitates an uncaused casual Agent is sure evidence for God. I can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I exist but the evidence is there that supports my existence. If the mathematical probability for the existence of a Being isn't enough scientific evidence then science has become stupid and can't read the writing on the wall.

TedBates-bu
Автор

When an ant looks up and sees you, it has no idea how to process what it is seeing. When we look at the sky, it's the same... we could be looking at God directly in the face but cannot comprehend Him. If a Creator created the universe, He would exist in multiple dimensions so it would make sense that we cannot see or process Him.

markytnshyt
Автор

We think we understand what we think we know which isn’t much. So pick one. Believe in something much bigger than what we can understand or don’t believe in what you think you know.

GoPackGo-pzuu
Автор

If the universe created itself, there would be no order without proper dimensions, it would be a garbage-like..But, as we all know the universe and all heavenly bodies are in fine-tuning, someone Divine being is responsible on it

roymaniego-mtxb
Автор

Al can't understand why the sky is blue people don't know why the night is dark everyone can't understand something opratator foolish thanks for reporting and sic Sincerely Master kuku 3:28

mehdizangiabadi-iwtn
Автор

In Michio Kaku words, if we cannot prove or disprove the existence of a god and have to look at other sources as evidence, such as the universe itself, then god has done a really pathetic job to prove himself/herself/itself. Throughout human age, we have always filled the gaps of our knowledge with the concept of god for everything that we cannot understand, such as lightening, diseases and everything else that we had no explanation but now we do for many. So, just because the origin or existence of the universe is a hard question, should we fill the gap with the god?

iblis
Автор

If someone knew, they could convince others.

mehdizangiabadi-iwtn
Автор

The universe is a loop ➰➰➰
Said by - Abyaan Mazumder
Its me 😅😊😮
Reason : A theory is there called Big crunch it says " After the expansion of Singularity from nothing it will stop until the universe reach a certain area and then again it will collapse with the speed faster than light and became the Singularity again " I think before us many universes are there which had collapse and became a new universe and vice-versa it means it's a loop
after our universe reaching a certain area then it will collapse and again it will became Singularity and then it will expend and became a new universe. This process will happen simultaneously. That's why our universe is a loop ➰

Celestialdevilyt
Автор

No Man has any ability to know the unknown😮

cedricemmanuel
Автор

God was created by the creator several years ago! God chose not to have a false past to a real past! Sincerely the senior foundation creator! Note: this is not Larry!

larryhammer
Автор

So many planets, stars, black holes, and it all comes by laws, ofcourse everything follows laws, but who created those laws and matter energy to follow those laws? 🤔😀. It's Creator of all. Is that hard to accept?

spidyrider
Автор

Well everything boils down to ENERGY, AN INTELLIGENT ENERGY.

ColSSMalik
Автор

If universe was created by big bang all the matter in univers still would comming to existence is that the case. I think God created universe and still commands evolution of stars .

esadsalkic
Автор

وما أوتيتم من العلم إلا قليلا
and of knowledge ye have been vouchsafed but little
آنچه از علم به شما دادند بسیار اندک است

mortezafarshchi
Автор

Obviously..the human mind is limited ... God is limitless, therefore, we mere creatures cannot comprehend 🙏✌️

Steven-kllh