How can NATO respond to Russia without escalating the war in Ukraine?

preview_player
Показать описание
NATO called an emergency meeting with Ukraine after Russia struck Dnipro with an experimental ballistic missile last week. Ivo Daalder, former U.S. ambassador to NATO, joins "The Daily Report" to discuss how the military alliance could respond to Russia, and whether it changes the state of the conflict.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

US would not allow Russia or China to install weapon systems near our border. Why should we believe Russia would act differently in regards to their border.

karich
Автор

NATO started all this in the 1990's

BruceWayne-gftf
Автор

By not giving Ukraine, any more aid and focusing on the 10 million homeless within our own borders. That’s a start.

ChrisBlanco-pe
Автор

No we need to stop and help our own citizens first, pumping billions into war when some countries dont have housing or food

lewisplayle
Автор

No more money for Ukraine! Make peace now.

frankhalsey-yc
Автор

What a level of stupidity! Since the expert said Russia losing 1, 500 a day. Are they fighting this war with clone soldier..?

paultgs
Автор

Give him part of Ukraine and have a NK system

rossspenser
Автор

😂😂😂 what a excuses this guy have.. one theu dont have many of those missle.. what a clown these people are..

ricardo
Автор

1, 500 sodiers West claim Russia loses everyday. In the past the claim was more than 1500 daily, infact they were stepping on bodies of their dead sodiers. Assuming it is just 1500 daily. This means for three years they are losing close to two million sodiers, more than the number of sodiers they have and dream to have

emmanuelkelechi
Автор

After three years of war, Ukraine has received permission to use Western weapons to attack targets in Russia, but it possesses too few of them. But they do not bring about decisive losses that could change the war's trajectory. U.S. officials are beginning to concede that Ukraine will be forced to negotiate with Russia and will ultimately have to give up territory it considers its own, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday, citing anonymous sources. With Trump returning to the White House in January and Kiev’s forces suffering mounting battlefield losses as Russia liberates occupied territory in Kursk Region, Ukraine is in its “weakest position in nearly three years, ” the paper said.

The “quiet recognition” that Kiev may need to give up territory is also spreading among its European backers, the Post said.

Biden’s recent decision to allow Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles to strike deep into Russian territory, as well as his move to provide Kiev with banned landmines, were made in the hope that it would give the country the “the strongest hand possible” before any potential negotiations with Russia after Trump takes office in January.

namur-iqih
Автор

By holding peace talks and establishing a DMZ before this escalates to global holocaust.

rocke
Автор

NATO is not supposed to answer to Russia. Ukraine is none of its business!

Fabio-umud
Автор

Thank god Trump is going to end this mess.

Purrrjury
Автор

The ruble is collapsing and inflation in Russia is out of control. Russia is falling apart.

imesub
Автор

Pls stop laying 1500 soldiers a day. Pls use ur brain and common sense

eytanmel
Автор

Start with coming together as nato agreeing to full trade embargo.

snowballs
Автор

1:57 "The don't have a lot of them?"

How you know?

creedt
Автор

Through peace ✌️ you stupid political hacks.

johnzarn
Автор

Its not escalation to defend yoirself ffs

folieadeux
Автор

Native members always tell us how many troops Russia is losing but they never tell us how many troops Ukraine is losing

GgeoffMagal