Is the 7950x3D worth it for MSFS VR?

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

thanks, good to see, i have 5800x3d and want to switch in the future, but i will wait longer now

digitalamok
Автор

Well, the 7800X3D is probably the best as it avoids the dual CCD issues. Maybe not worth the upgrade from a 5800X3D but a better choice than the 7950X3D is all you do is MSFS. 7800X3D is now around £360 so would be hard to recommend a 5800X3D now.

Mark_Point
Автор

The 5800X3D image looks a lot softer and the steam gauges are blurry compared to the 7950X3D looks like the 5800 have DLSS on ?

evanphotography
Автор

If you can try the 7800x3d chip... I wonder if it out performs the 7950x3d in msfs in some use cases it does

gizmodrives
Автор

I went from a 5800x3d to 7950x3d ( Asus TUF x670, 3080ti, 32 gb Trident Z5 neo ddr5 6000mhz). Fresh install several times and yes all the newest bios/drivers blah blah. In VR running reverb g2 I would get the strangest stutters in MSFS. Cruising at 60-70 fps then just tank to 2 fps. Got worse after msfs patches. I tried all the adjustments on the posts and nothing would stick and be stable. It has to be the switching of ccd's. Thats my best guess at this point. Others say the same. Jay-z-2cent just removed his 7950x3d and went back to intel because of strange behavior. I got so tired of it I bought a 7800x3d. Everything else the same and stutters gone. CPU is probably just too niche right now. I have shelved it and will wait till they figure out drivers/ gamebar / memory speed incompatibility issues.

Shinobi-One
Автор

The system on the right is clearly running at a higher resolution.

uhohDavinci
Автор

The graphics settings are not the same. The 7950X3D side is sharper and appears to be higher resolution, whereas the 5800X3D side appears to be lower resolution. I call shenanigans.

paradoxicalcat
Автор

what are you getting with the default A320 at say, heathrow on vr? how many fps?

snowbro