The 9/11 Pentagon attacks

This is a small clip from Seconds from Disaster for educational purposes only.
Full episodes can be watched on National Geographic Channel.

[robtalstra]

The 85 surveillance cameras on the most secure and technically advanced buildings in the world isn't able to produce one decent single undistorted image of any plane while MANY hand held recorders that same day are able to capture clear video of planes crashing into the WTC towers. If cheap hand held video devices of 2001 had such clear resolution, why would the surveillance cameras have low spacial resolution?
Why would the surveillance cameras record at low frame rates (low temporal resolution), generally at one frame per second in the most highly advanced building in the world?? Many of them are placed on top of the building so they most certainly the would have captured something coming..What are they hiding? If they are not hiding anything then i would ask why would they have low resolution cameras on such a protected building? This has always bugged me about the Pentagon incident..
Show less
REPLY

[frankpeter]

one of the most secured and surveilled structures in the world...
there should be countless videos of this incident...

[toksdad]

the reporter who claimed " there are no signs a plane hit the pentagon " has been erased...

[balf]

Amazing how the pilot levelled the plane so low without hitting the ground

[jamesinbradford]

The most secure building in the world ? My local corner shop had better CCTV at the time, it could see a fly shit !!

[HalfEatenMedia]

2017 and still waiting for answers on the pentagon attack, still waiting for footage. I find it highly remarkable that only one terrible quality security camera footage is all that documents an attack.

[PetrifEye]

Even if the airframe of the plane were completely destroyed, the engines would have remained somewhat intact. Aircraft engines are made of steel and titanium. They don't just burn up into dust.

[richiesspeedshop]

Forget about having just one camera angle. Its literally impossible to get a passenger plane that low, at those speeds, and at that angle to hit perfectly. Especially on the first try. It goes way beyond the boundaries and laws of physics.

[truckcamper]

There was videos at gas stations, coffee shops, and many more stores around that area, and the government came in and took all the videos. That’s a true fact.

[christophergraff]

2.3 Trillion $ went missing & the "plane" hits the very spot where the accounting dept. is held ? - Nothing to see here, Move along ... Move along

[artybell]

The wingspan of a Boeing 757 is 123 ft. The width of the gouge in the side of the Pentagon is approx. 60 ft. The official story does not work.

[TheMuni]

Everyone who's smart enough literally knows that aluminum is MUCH stronger than reinforced concrete. Like duh. The plane should have entered the building cleanly and completely intact, leaving a cartoon-like hole in the shape of the plane on the face of the building. It should have also produced a goofy slide-whistle sound effect as it entered which should have been heard for miles, yet no one reported such a sound.

[evilminion]

And just like that, billions of unaccounted US dollars are forgotten.

[limeyosu]

Pan am plane blew up over Lockerbie Scotland 20, 000 feet on the air there was bodies still strapped in seats! Tons of wreckage! Yet a so called plane hits the most camera guarded building in the world and there is not even a wing or tail thin or body hmm! Yep bs

[jamieorton]

I am not a conspiracy guy but this one has always troubled me

[kirkglundal]

Clearly computer graphics show us exactly what happened! Ha! 🙄 We wouldn't need computer graphic lies if they would simply release all the footage from the countless security cameras on that place, all the time!

[stivi]

all those involved will have their judgment day...wait and see

[jonathanking]

Funny how they had to use computer graphics for an event that was caught by 88 different cameras. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

[patrickr.]

Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, not a commercial airliner. Furthermore, show me plane

[gunnarerdmann]

They turn off the transponder-- does not mean you cant see it on radar.