Major Upgrade: When Will SpaceX Start The V2 Starship Project?

preview_player
Показать описание
I explain when SpaceX will build the V2 Starship!

#SpaceX #starship #elonmusk #starbase

Editing: John Young, Alex Potvin, Stefanie Schlang
Photography: John Cargile, John Winkopp & Stefanie Schlang
3D Animation: Voop3D
Script & Research: Eryk Gawron, Oskar Wrobel, Felix Schlang
LIVE Production: Astro Roadie
Host: Felix Schlang
Production: Stefanie & Felix Schlang
Graphics & Media Processing: Jonathan Heuer, Felix Schlang

Credit:

⭐SpaceX
⭐NASA
⭐VirtualSpace_3D on X: @Lolomatico3d
⭐The Ring Watchers on X: @RingWatchers

📄Links for this Episode:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

When you gonns interview musk? I love your guy's work, where do you get the cool shirts?

donaldoliver
Автор

I want Starships to have landing legs. It would really suck if SN15 turned out to be the last Starship to land on earth with legs.
However if SpaceX insists on eventually trying to catch a Starship they shouldn't even bother to install the current style lifting points on V2 V3 Starships as there isnt is a chance in hell that setup would work for catching a Starship. Alignment with the holes on the ship takes far too much time. The Starships will likely need a retractable version of lifting arms similar to the ones on the boosters.

smavtmb
Автор

The longer starships will be v3 not v2!

sander
Автор

Question for you, when mechazilla is catching the Starship, will it be catching it on the flaps or those hold points?

thatjoeguy
Автор

Can pleaaase someone tell me why they don't eject the satellites to the small side of the satellites . So the payload door wouldn't need to be that big.

Автор

Lets just focus on a successful flight of V1. Also, legs should be added regardless of the landing situation.

NOM-X
Автор

I thought they havent even established v1 yet all 4 remaining rockets are prototypes

vash
Автор

Why make a starlink only version? Why not go for full payload bay that can be used for both starlink and other payloads?

yujinhikita
Автор

Strange that the door is at the bottom. Put it at the top, since it has less weight and load to carry.

adenwellsmith
Автор

Why don't you put a date on these "updates". This looks like outdated information. Whose to know how it fits into the current construct unless it has a date.

rocroc
Автор

V2 has ominous historical significance

johnbroker
Автор

Will the v2 starship use on flight 6th?

NatureLover-._
Автор

These payload bays are a problem. It’s cleaver for starlink and all, but it’s designed exclusively for one satellite type. No way to deploy other types of payloads means the whole design ethos atm is just a bigger starlink carrier. If this is going to take cargo and people to space, the moon, and Mars like we’ve never seen before, they need to seriously rethink that payload bay

therealworldsociety
Автор

I wouldn't read much into the payload section being smaller. If this is a pathfinder there's really no reason for it to have the two additional segments. They're just modeling a new door geometry. No need to build the whole bay for that.

gregsteele
Автор

suggestion : put new and old together at the same picture

ericchen
Автор

Still waiting for the tower chopsticks to catch starship

cloudwalker
Автор

And when exactly it is contracted to deliver a lander to the moon?

szewcsvd
Автор

Why so much excitement over a smaller payload bay?

Wemdiculous
Автор

I would like to know the status of Starship Lunar Lander.

PanioloBee
Автор

So what time the fireworks start this time?

sandraude