U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument on Former President Trump's Immunity Claim

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you C-SPAN for actually showing the names of the people talking and for providing captions.

maestoso
Автор

Thank you for allowing us to watch and listen.

Dearest-
Автор

The fact that The SCOTUS didn’t immediately and unanimously decide to send this case back down to the lower court is absolutely unnerving. #perilousTimes #indeed

V.L.R.
Автор

Thank you to c span for this opportunity to
watch this historic case hearing! And putting up
the photos if who was speaking. Many thanks!

Pam-sijp
Автор

Why did this case even get to the Supreme Court? I guess Biden can just have Seal Team 6 take out Trump if there is 100% immunity. Right?

wallochdm
Автор

As an Australian this all seems so bizarre. Surely the lawfulness and immunity of the act must be considered within its entire context. The head of state should only be able to break the law where they reasonably and in good faith believe that the act itself is absolutely necessary for the public interest. Here, the court system was the place for disputation over the election outcome, not Executive action.

rikkyrok
Автор

I cannot remember (in my 73 years) when I have been more disappointed in a group of INTELLIGENT adults than I am with those who are currently seated as this Supreme Court…Unbiased keepers of our Constitution.

MimiTwo
Автор

Thank you C SPAN for being neutral and streaming the full argument along with showing who is talking

camilodelvillar
Автор

Any Supreme Court Judge that agrees with absolute Immunity, should resign

lesterstarks
Автор

It is surprising to me that some Justices seem to forget the structure of checks and balances when positing their hypotheticals. It is as if they assume they don’t exist, so they can raise false flags to call attention to an implausible scenario and the counsel has to keep reminding them that there is a Constitutional path to investigate and prosecute.

wordragon
Автор

27:38 He very nearly said "elector scheme".... 😂

glenmorrison
Автор

Boy his lawyers won't give up! UNBELIEVABLE

jojodress
Автор

Nixon, in my adult life. Tighten up!!

srercrcr
Автор

It’s hard to listen to John sauer. His voice is horrible

kingeris
Автор

John Sauer's voice sounds like AI and it's scarily inhumane

johanan
Автор

I only want that justices do their work with honesty!

mgsschuback
Автор

The lawyer said at 1:26:31 "making a mistake doesn't lead you to criminal prosecution". This statement is absolute absurdity! Every single day people are prosecuted for unknowingly making mistakes and spend time in jail over it.

stevehedman
Автор

Our forefathers never thought there would be anyone like trump

rzrvsol
Автор

Thank you Justice Jackson …….at last somebody with common sense !

jenniferszarek
Автор

Thank you for providing this audio. . . so that We the People can continue in a clear and present comprehension of the Constitutional backbone that provides integrity and strength for our Rule of Law. Keep up the good work!

careyrowland