U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Former President Donald Trump's Colorado Ballot Eligibility

preview_player
Показать описание
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Trump v. Anderson, a case concerning former President Trump’s appeal of a Colorado Supreme Court’s decision ruling him ineligible to be on the state’s presidential election ballot.

The Supreme Court's oral argument starts at 7:56.

Former President Trump's news conference begins at 2:25:41.

C-SPAN: Created by Cable in 1979. Offered as a public service.

Follow us:

Subscribe:
#cspan
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

So when will the court decide? I predict they will decide 9-0 against Colorado.

bigal
Автор

Thank you for posting this. The world is watching the supreme court.

zainredding
Автор

Best way to get news, straight from the source. Thank you @CSPAN, just want facts, not pundits.

justinb
Автор

Why did we not see this in the media? Thank you for airing !

robynaronna
Автор

Trump Opening: 8:00
Anderson Opening: 1:01:40
Colorado Opening: 2:01:12
Trump Rebuttal: 2:14:14

fundifferent
Автор

Thank you for the broadcast. I appreciate it!

LuciferArc
Автор

Thank you for this unadulterated hearing.

booniedogchamorru
Автор

I AM CANADIAN AND I AM PRAYING FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. STAY STRONG AMERICANS AND STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS. FIGHT BACK.

penniejoolz
Автор

What a magnificent country this is - that allows freedom of speech and the people's access to the legal arguments in the Supreme court1

louiseross
Автор

Jonathan Mitchell is a brilliant attorney…..What a mind.

Shineon
Автор

It is particularly funny for Mr. Murray to say that it is "unlikely" that a lower court could reach a different conclusion than SCOTUS the same actual day that Hawaii said: "Nope, the SCOTUS ruling on the Second Amendment doesn't apply to Hawaii!"

GuiltyPleasures
Автор

Half a million views, for CSPAN! That's very encouraging that citizens are taking this much of an interest in today's culture.

justinb
Автор

I love being able to watch history in motion. thank you c span

paulfuller
Автор

It's hilarious that when they are trying to hold the black signs up toward the end, all we can really see is "TRUMP" "TRUMP"!!! Lol.. thanks for the advertisements, guys!

micheknows
Автор

in the end The founding fathers did not want a king or anything to do with a king.

greenhatparts
Автор

Facts and law that is what they supreme court should focus on... opinions or threats should never matter.

iwantabetterworld
Автор

It’s almost like there needs to be some sort of set standard for what insurrection is and how to determine if is person engaged in that act. Say like a law and a criminal conviction on that law.

Aaron-fosy
Автор

"Integrity is the very breath of justice. Confidence in our law, our courts and in the administration of justice is our supreme interest. No practice must be permitted to prevail which invites toward the administration of justice a doubt or distrust of its integrity."
Wheeler, Chief Justice of Connecticut, 1928

jonathansnider
Автор

This Jason guy should be a politician instead with the amount of time he is not answering the question and replying back with completely something else

eugenepark
Автор

An insurrection that only lasted a few hours without being armed with tour guides WOW the one we had 155 years ago was a lot different from what I read

michaeljordan