BREAKING NEWS: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments In Trump Immunity Claim In 2020 Election Case

preview_player
Показать описание
On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard Trump v. United States.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

We American People has rights for free speech. Have people forgotten ❓❓🤔😞

eumbmks
Автор

Never in my life I ever thought something like this would ever happen. This is freaking nuts exclamation point

dslyufp
Автор

Sotomayors questioning should frighten Obama.

johnpetrig
Автор

What a waste of SCOTUS time. No law was broken!

johnwayne
Автор

How is a judge arguing with the attorney? This is so ridiculous. These judges are supposed to be non-biased, and clearly that’s not the case

personalreviews
Автор

If he is being judged by motivation should we not be looking at the motives of bringing him to trial in the first place?

thebowrests
Автор

If you cant explain what a women is.... I highly doubt one could tell the difference between an official act and not.

gratmccall
Автор

WE THE PEOPLE must slap a lawsuit on the judicial system if we can’t vote for our representatives

cryptoqueen
Автор

What about the prosecutorial abuse by AG’s, DOJ, FBI or DOJ?

tiatopolski
Автор

This woman is bent on trying Trump . She is putting something forward that is Completely Ridiculous.

gayletodd
Автор

It is completely frightening that our Republic now rests on a few questions of judges who don't even attempt to hide they have already made a biased decision. It doesn't matter what the issue, left or right, they interpret the law according to their politics. Pray for our country.

debrawelcome
Автор

He had an official responsibility to insure a fair and.accurate election.

barbarametaxas
Автор

Is Jackson REALLY saying that all of the government follows the law? Really? When Pelosi was caught insider trader, she was not prosecuted.... and said to the press, "Those were just good business decisions." It would be good to make all of our public servants to be judged by the same laws as you are now assuming over Trump.

vickilee
Автор

Terrible! Unbelievable! What an injustice!

minervabernal
Автор

There needs to be a law that prevents appointing nit wits to the Supreme Court!

jefftamura
Автор

_DOJ guy_ basically insists that *it is different* when _they_ do it. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

globalterroil
Автор

Father God..Your will be done in the lives of everyone involved in this proceeding..
Let the lying tongues be exposed and counted against themselves..

lightfountain
Автор

"I'm having a hard time thinking" is the most appropriate phrase Brown had to say. Judges are suppored to be unbiased. Obviously, that isn't the case for her.

plainliloleme
Автор

She is not allowing the attorney to finish his sentences! Very disappointing for our constitutional rights

beanie
Автор

I can only pray that our Supreme Court will be the one court left for we the people to be able to rely on for President Trump!!

shadowplayzrobloxandsandbo