Why NATO may have to stop a Russian invasion - without the US

preview_player
Показать описание
Europe has just three years to get ready for an attack by Russia on NATO, and could end up losing a war against Vladimir Putin. That was the apocalyptic-sounding warning from both Poland’s secretary of state and a respected German think-tank in recent weeks. It is even conceivable that Europe could have to defend itself without the help of the United States – the backbone of NATO. Could the continent survive?

#dailymail #russia #ukraine

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"Russia can't even conquer Ukraine"
"Anyway, Russia will attack NATO"
Yeah, makes total sense, nothing contradictory.

pc_suffering
Автор

Nope, Russia is not going to invade Nato for the same reason Nato has not put boots on the ground in Ukraine...Nuclear weapons

concrete
Автор

The world is insane.Humanity didn't learn from history apparently.

Dean...
Автор

On one hand they wanted us to believe Russia was losing the war against Ukraine.. And on the other hand they want us to believe Russia is about to take 4 other countries 😂😂

cheekyape
Автор

Lockheed martin are getting creative with their commericals

pinkkitty
Автор

The problem was lack of equipment not the equipment itself.

vadimer
Автор

The UK is a disgrace, one point in time we had the strongest army in the world. Now we couldn’t even sell out Wembley.

drfrog
Автор

This is the first time I've ever heard someone try and claim NATO weapons are proving to be less powerful than expected lmao

elijah
Автор

I get really worried about the media actively spreading conspiracy theories like this article.

lassel
Автор

As an American my southern border is more important than ukraines

sheepdog
Автор

I'm a *lot* more worried about the internal threat that has been imported into Europe than I am about Russia.

incurableromantic
Автор

The idea that the weaponry sent to Ukraine represent well what NATO would use is quite wrong. NATO would use its aviation and integrate weapons in different strategies that Ukraine cannot implement, and it makes a huge difference.

emjizone
Автор

I don't think NATO's weapons are ineffective, it's just that there is less of a supply from NATO.

sevfett
Автор

Rheinmetall Marketing team is getting a raise for this one

yeetyeet
Автор

Those same 2014 war games analysts would've predicted Russia to take Kiev in 72 hours as well...

Vincentovich
Автор

Poland is the only country that is taking stuff seriously, the rest of Europe are slill in sleep mode

sony
Автор

is the Sulwaki gap still the game changer? I would think with Finland being a NATO member with Sweden's application pending the Baltic sea is open to supply the Baltic states. Is that wrong to assume?

PC-efqg
Автор

In Tuker Carlson’s interview with Putin he said Russia achieved its historical borders when the Russian Empire hit its peak. Still gives the same point but is really interesting that he is trying to push this on western viewers

Tox_wasnt_here
Автор

Absolute nonsense. Corporate media really is finished, in the modern age of freely available information.

markpalmer
Автор

As a Norwegian I know a lot of polish... Their mindset is never again

andersgulowsen