Scag Turf Tiger vs Exmark Lazer Z x-series

Head to head Exmark Lazer Z x-series 36hp efi vs Scag Turf Tiger 35 hp Vanguard big block

[wh]

You didn't even move the camera to look at the Exmark cut ? I would like to see the comparison but that does not exist in this video .

[michaely]

Where is the verses? Just two guys mowing.

[Stegs]

having owned both brands, hands down scag is far superior. Nothing beats the velocity plus deck.

[speedracer]

Scag & ExMark are damn good & Comparable mowers... I have used both and it comes down to HP/Torque, Blades, Blade speed & Lift. 

HP... Just because it has XX HP/Torque at the output shaft of the motor doesn't mean it has the same at the blades! 

Blades... Sharp V's Dull V's Lift & Normal V's Gator (for Discharge size and spread)

As for comfort... I think Scag will need to catch up with ExMark... Their rider isolating seat & seat frame W/the shock absorbers is a dream come true for those of us that spend the better part of the day sitting on one of these beasts! Having just a shock absorbing seat is still a gut wrenching experience on some less than savory turf! (I'm sure you all know what I'm talking about)

[colestaples]

Those mowers are pretty much identical

[ifyoutip]

My opinion. This video ain't even a comparison. Both are very good mowers. The new exmark got a really good ride and cut. I find exmark a little shorter so they fit on a trailer better and mow hills good. Often they are are a little lighter in weight than some heavier brands. That is good because they tow easier and don't leave ruts in a wet yard so bad or get stuck as easy. Also just a little bit cheaper and longer lasting. I have seen to many companies make mowers to heavy with poor design. Example, Like ferris with a super heavy cat diesel. Give me a big block gas engine any day. Not a Heavy piece of junk. The drive system had to move so much weight, add a loaded bagger of wet grass and front weights and the drive system would collapse after a couple hundred hrs. Some companies skimp where it needs more strength and add where it ain't necessary. Scag is better for mowing heavy overgrown grass than exmark in my opinion. Also a few years ago they knew exmark had the best deck because when they copied it they got sued by exmark. That says all I needed to know when I made my choice of mowers. I went with exmark. Have 1100hrs on mine currently. To those that mow pastures with lawn mowers that's really cool to do. I used to mow pastures of grass also, but I used a 175hp john deere tractor with a 15' wide bat wing mower and sat in a air conditioned cab.

[khyantaeharris]

nice grass where is the verses! just two guys mowing.

[dwb]

The Scag is mowing a little faster than the Exmark. That's the only "head to head" I saw. Not very helpful as a quality comparison.

[PuBearsticks]

scag is obviously faster but more importantly to me is that it looks like it absorbs the bumpy terrain better.

[Jjason]

i ran exmark im thinkin about scag next

[martinmelendez]

Theses mowers put my Raduis x series to shame 23.5hp 😅

[JusticeforLiberty]

This is a bad video and you should feel bad for making it. There is no "versus" at all.

[clintymouse]

The ride quality of the x mark/toro is absolutely horrible.

[raymondj]

i choose the Bad Boy they are the best hahaha id pick the scag outta these 2 though !