filmov
tv
Fact-Check #6: Paul Saladino on Fiber and Gut Health | The Proof
Показать описание
One of my goals for 2023 is teaching you how to better assess the legitimacy of someone’s claim.
It’s easy to cherry pick small parts of studies, or isolated findings, that are not in accordance with the wider body of evidence on that topic… and use them to create content to an audience that either a) wants to hear the claim you’re making so won’t bother to question it and may even propagate it or b) doesn’t have the skills or time to run a fact check.
In this example we examine fibre and gut health. There is a plethora of evidence that demonstrates a dose dependent relationship between fibre consumption and mortality - the more fibre people eat, the lower their risk of premature death. A finding that’s consistent across cohort studies with people from countries all over the world. You might be thinking - yeh but people who eat more fibre may smoke less, exercise more, drink less alcohol etc. Researchers are aware of this and to limit the effect this may be they use what’s called a multi-variate adjustment in their models. And after this the effect for fibre remains, and it’s a ‘dose-dependent’ relationship meaning the more fibre one consumes the lower their risk of premature death (benefits likely continuing as one goes above daily intake recommendations). (PMID: 25552267, PMID: 30638909)
Despite this Paul Saladino decides to use this clinical intervention study out of Stanford to support his story that humans thrive on low fibre meat heavy diets. When we go into a study, wanting it to fit a preconceived view, it’s highly likely we will misinterpret the results. And that’s exactly what Paul has done. (PMID: 34256014)
Maybe @carnivoremd2.0 can sit down with the lead researcher Dr Justin Sonnenburg to better understand the study. Or if not, at the very least, listen to episode #191 of The Proof with Dr Sonnenburg and Dr Gardner. 📺
- Simon 🙏🏻
====
Want to support the show?
It’s easy to cherry pick small parts of studies, or isolated findings, that are not in accordance with the wider body of evidence on that topic… and use them to create content to an audience that either a) wants to hear the claim you’re making so won’t bother to question it and may even propagate it or b) doesn’t have the skills or time to run a fact check.
In this example we examine fibre and gut health. There is a plethora of evidence that demonstrates a dose dependent relationship between fibre consumption and mortality - the more fibre people eat, the lower their risk of premature death. A finding that’s consistent across cohort studies with people from countries all over the world. You might be thinking - yeh but people who eat more fibre may smoke less, exercise more, drink less alcohol etc. Researchers are aware of this and to limit the effect this may be they use what’s called a multi-variate adjustment in their models. And after this the effect for fibre remains, and it’s a ‘dose-dependent’ relationship meaning the more fibre one consumes the lower their risk of premature death (benefits likely continuing as one goes above daily intake recommendations). (PMID: 25552267, PMID: 30638909)
Despite this Paul Saladino decides to use this clinical intervention study out of Stanford to support his story that humans thrive on low fibre meat heavy diets. When we go into a study, wanting it to fit a preconceived view, it’s highly likely we will misinterpret the results. And that’s exactly what Paul has done. (PMID: 34256014)
Maybe @carnivoremd2.0 can sit down with the lead researcher Dr Justin Sonnenburg to better understand the study. Or if not, at the very least, listen to episode #191 of The Proof with Dr Sonnenburg and Dr Gardner. 📺
- Simon 🙏🏻
====
Want to support the show?
Комментарии