BIBLE Contradicts Itself: Animals | Gay Jesus #deconstruction #shorts #cc #exvangelical

preview_player
Показать описание
There's contradictions everywhere....Like literally from the very first verses. People who tell you there are no contradictions, are either uneducated or have not ever looked into it.

So, let's start a series on Genesis alone. This is Pt. 2: Animal yes....literally even Animals contradict.

MAYBE, because not only was the Bible written by a whole bunch of different people, it was also translated by...a whole bunch of different people. It is not a single view, nor the direct word of God written down lol. Genesis 1 and 2 literally have two different authors, with two different rhetorical goals (scholarly consensus, not just mine).
- JeGaysus

If you want to debate in the comments do so kindly. Remember being a phobe doesn't make you an edgelord it makes you a Jerk. Check my other vids for more fun stuff, and soon to come 'deeper' biblical history and theological debates.

Welcome to my archive! I am posting all my videos as shorts. One by one, follow along! Especially if you haven't seen the originals and are new here.

This is not your typical religious or spiritual channel, I encourage questions and critical thought! After all THIS is the time for christian deconstruction. We love all and this is a queer space.

I am available on all socials as 'Jegaysus'

Spread love, gAyMEN
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Description:

There's contradictions everywhere....Like literally from the very first verses. People who tell you there are no contradictions, are either uneducated or have not ever looked into it.

So, let's start a series on Genesis alone. This is Pt. 2: Animal yes....literally even Animals contradict.


MAYBE, because not only was the Bible written by a whole bunch of different people, it was also translated by...a whole bunch of different people. It is not a single view, nor the direct word of God written down lol. Genesis 1 and 2 literally have two different authors, with two different rhetorical goals (scholarly consensus, not just mine).
- JeGaysus

JeGaysus
Автор

This stuff I love. Will the ones who need to hear this actually be able to process this? Will it still not compute with their programming? I pray to Jegaysus they will 🙏🏼

BartholomewAwakened
Автор

no one questions that jegaysus have been fab before and after his creation

hamster
Автор

It seems you're getting a lot of haters for no good reason. So I'm here to say that I found this entertaining and cute. I know a lot of people who just shun most religious things, but you dont. Keep it up!

freyaburks
Автор

Genesis 2:19 is specifically talking about the animals in the Garden of Eden, not the animals as a whole. It could also be talking about guiding the animals to the Garden of Eden.

glaciatedluxray
Автор

Well animals were around before us but there are also animals that were made after us….. farm animals and pets were made after to help us …… so yeah

kingmidasvlogs
Автор

Creationists have been arguing that Gen2 "dEScRiBEs Gen1" for nearly half a century and don't have an issue with the contradiction because they just splice in interpretations whole cloth

rylog
Автор

The animals from Genesis 2, except the serpent, stayed in Eden.

thomasjenkins
Автор

7Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. 8Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities. 9Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. 10But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. 11Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. 12These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; 13Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. 14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,  15To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him. 16These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men’s persons in admiration because of advantage.

NOEJS
Автор

No no no the second verse was God saying for the animals (which he had just made) to come to Adam so Adam could NAME them

Hittaz_Isaac
Автор

Since you study the Greek and Hebrew versions could you elaborate?

Charliehopper
Автор

Or God made animals before and after man's existence just a wide array of them

John-lwxc
Автор

Yea that’s completely wrong, and honestly if you’d use an actual translation like new king James or something actually credible you’d know this

“Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1‬:‭24‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

So here we see God created animals

And

“Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was its name.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭2‬:‭19‬ ‭NKJV‬‬
So here we see that the writer of Genesis was referring back to the other verse as a way to say “Everything that God had made” God had brought to Adam… it’s not hard to see this if you actually read the Bible

freedomeagle
Автор

God created Eve to be Adams helper. Adam named the animals before Eve was made.

justinlockert
Автор

You can take the English literally when you ensure that it's been translated well

Mimi-.-
Автор

I mean, women were created twice... if you take biblical creation literally.

whitneydouglas
Автор

Yep. Even translating between 2 modern languages you run into some weirdness. Try translating poetry from English into French. It will make you pound your head on the desk. Literal translation is hard enough, but throw in an ancient language and the fact that the Bible has a lot of poetry and music? EEP!

lyllydd
Автор

Why do you think Jesus was transgender???

MrPeculiar.
Автор

As a Christian, i like your content, quite informative. And to the haters: Islam (rather: Muslim states) should be so open minded as to accept and even gain from such content! For me your channel is an example of how accepting religion CAN be.

frederiken
Автор

Yeah this very offensive to my religion

Jjet
welcome to shbcf.ru