6 THINGS WE LEARNT FROM CHELSEA 2-1 WEST HAM

preview_player
Показать описание
6 THINGS WE LEARNT FROM CHELSEA 2-1 WEST HAM. Chelsea 2-1 West Ham highlights saw Chelsea come from behind to beat West Ham 2-1 at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea 2-1 West Ham goals were scored by Ben Chilwell and Kai Havertz. Chelsea 2-1 West Ham extended highlights also saw West Ham equalise late on but for VAR to rule out West Ham's second goal from Maxwell Cornet for a foul on Edouard Mendy. A feisty London derby finishes Chelsea 2-1 West Ham in the Premier League. Let me know the 6 things you learnt from Chelsea 2-1 West Ham in the comments below!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

1. The tempo of our play is too slow.
2. Set pieces both in defending them and attacking esp. corners needs some attention at training.
3. RLC improved today showing some controlled aggression.
4 There’s healthy competition at LWB.
5. Mendy looks incredibly out of form and should be dropped.
6. Fofana gave an assured performance on debut and will only improve.

Andysw
Автор

Actually I dont felt like we won the game. I felt so many problems today. Every player moved like a factory machine, laking creativity and off-the-ball movements. Sterling was the only one trying to make some chances by his individual ability. Tuchel have to work on this faster. Now every team know our style. WE NEED CREATIVITY.

balebeatsmiconagain
Автор

Great to see Chilwell doing what he does best. We greatly missed him last season. A fully fit Chilwell used to be a calming presence. Hope he delivers consistently.

Plus
Автор

Few things I noticed:
1.Chillwell need to start our next game
2.Fofana was solid
3. Mendy need to grow confidence asap
4. Antonio should have been sent off, since that foul against Silva
5. Jorghino needs to stop this bloody mistake
6. Thanks BEN CHILWELL, Thanks KAI HAVERTZZZ
7. Can't wait to see Auba start Upfront..

Lastly hope this build back our confidence to winning ways

sophiaisabella
Автор

We need to have Broja on the top pitch, he wins most 1 vs 1s and provides a lot of physicality, aggression and moves the ball very well. He’s a main contributor to the winning goal with that pass to Chilly.

Blue_Capsule
Автор

Pulisic did what he could. He didnt set the world on fire but idk what you expect when we go 60 min with TWO attacking players on the field (being played out of position). The midfield offered them nothing. Also not sure how you can have positive words for RLC and Gallagher.. The english bias is real.

jakehines
Автор

We were on top of the league last season with a healthy chilwell I’ll never forget that

darnellgreene
Автор

If Pulisic offers nothing, then what do the other players offer? This is Tuchel's attack, if it gets better is only because the opponent allows it. I haven't seen anything special from any of the other attackers, save Sterling and he's finishing is not top level.

mtavares
Автор

I disagree on pulisic, he was the only person in the first half with attacking intentions and dribbles

uitgekleejesompigevochtige
Автор

I feel we re so sentimental with our analysis as a Chelsea fan. It’s easy to make Mendy, Azpi a scapegoat but easy to let others off. Reece put his team in that position, it does not make sense heading the ball backwards from that angle with a striker approaching Mendy.

kunleh
Автор

Spot on, George! Chilly changed the game for me thanks to his forward runs!
I think that's why Chilly & Reece are still our best WB combo, because of the kind of movement & runs they make (+ brilliant crosses & shooting!)

EL-hcok
Автор

Honestly i feel like Pulisic was decent in the match. He tried to play the ball towards the opposition's box
I hope he gets more minutes before we can judge him
COYB

gitongadavid
Автор

My observation
1. Fofana was super solid
2. We don’t have any creativity as a team
3. Chiwell was a breath of fresh air
4. Mendy needs to be benched you has lost form and confidence

femioni
Автор

Mr clutch absolutely love him Kai Havertz. Last minute once again, who else? Still doesn't deserve a start until we see more consistency from him. Buzzing

asiverwexu
Автор

Let's be 100% real here, this should be a 2-2 and it only papers over the cracks due to a very poor decision by the referee. Sure you can say that it evens out from the Tottenham game, but we're not going to get situations like this week in week out. We cannot afford to continually capitulate when we go ahead because VAR won't always be there to bail us out.

TheKisekiNut
Автор

I think pulisic played ok. But we weren’t pushing enough players forward until kai, broja, and Mount came in. That’s why sterling also was not able to do much until later in the second half. I don’t think sterlings performance was that different than pulisic. Pulisic tried to go forward whenever he got the ball but west ham always had everyone behind the ball.

prashantsubramanian
Автор

1. Koulibaly should give John terry his number back
2. RLC has been consistent with doing whatever job he is tasked to do
3. Chilwell is always good when going forward and he proved the point that we can’t create without players actually running.
4. Jorginho proves in the few minutes why you can’t trust him.
5. Chelsea should abolish the back 3 and play with a back 4.

darnellgreene
Автор

Connor was AWFUL, the attack sputtered anytime he got the ball, CP was easily the best attacker the first 60 minutes ( not saying much because WH totally shut us down)... he didn't do enough to demand the next start but CP was the only player early on that was occasionally getting WH on their heels

benpooler
Автор

Are you kidding me dude about Christian Pulisic look at his stats 60 Minutes played 24 for 24 in passing two for two and challenges in one shot on goal just hate Christian Pulisic cause he’s American

jorgewolff
Автор

Christian Pulisic was very average but Gallagher was not? WHAT! besides from Sterling, Pulisic was the most threatening attacker.

Gallagher's set pieces were poor, he took too many touches. he was very poor!

rethabilefeni