One Reason To Put Larger Intake Valves In A Head

preview_player
Показать описание
I show some flow numbers and talk about why I’m increasing the valve size a set of Promaxx 290 bbc heads.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I had the 2.19 1.88 valves put in my 68 Camaro with closed chamber oval Port head's made a very noticeable improvement, great video keep them coming

johnweaver
Автор

FloTek 290 is the same head, but comes with the 2.300 valve standard

donavan
Автор

At what point does the increasing valve size have a diminished return or even loss for increased shrouding. Would think the low lift numbers would be affected most…

georgedreisch
Автор

Yeah . 6:30 ish . Sometimes laying back the short turn will stuff flow up. The large, gradual curve is what you need to make the port work

biastv
Автор

did you ever flow these after you took that ridge off?

andy
Автор

Id love to see how much the AFR 265s would pick up with a bigger intake valve and your valve job . Did you do a set with a 0.225 intake valve ?

richardsmith-qyvl
Автор

Do you to a shallow top cut to get rid of the ridge or blend by hand?

jmflournoy
Автор

OLÁ. Olhando a instalação da nova séde de válvulas percebe-se seu parcial conhecimento do assunto que tratas. ABRAÇOS... Roberto Udo Krapf

robertoudokrapf
Автор

I had to change an intake on a very old dart head to 2.35s because they were sunk so much. Hopefully you’ll be getting them for a critique soon and flow them and then beat me up for my chamber work😂

davidleary
Автор

Eric, do you believe these results are exclusive to this head? Or will all BBC heads behave similar with a larger valve installed? Awesome video!

jakeblack
Автор

I wonder if opening the chamber adjacent to the intake would help low lift flow with the larger valve. I realize these heads will get returned, but maybe that and an adjustment in seat angles could help.

Thanks for the videos.

vpackard
Автор

For a street/strip 461 turbo motor >15 psi would the 290 head be better or would it choke it? Thinking it would have good cruising velocity at low rpm and be more efficient.

Ghosts_and_Cars
Автор

On a engine with more cam I'd like to see a dyno comparison of normal valve, then ridge cut in the face for anti reversion (think it was Vizard who talked about that). And then radius of that modified intake valve. A does the face cut help with reversion and if so can you radius the intake thereafter kinda thing.

sc.
Автор

The idea of enormous valves, and ports to match, always means big numbers on a flow bench, but unless the head is for a race only engine, which is operated WFO pretty much all the time, the results on road vehicle are likely to be disappointing. Venturi type porting, when the intake ducts are actually made smaller, is likely to work better for the road.

humourless
Автор

I’d like to see the peak flows under boost for this head.

IamYofXY
Автор

I really want to see what happens. How the two compare.

garyhosier
Автор

could you use/ try thin MLS gaskets to get the compression up that ridge
AS opposed to sinking the valves to kill low lift flow to make a big cam into a shorter cam
on the larger valve you get a new higher seat which can help unless you have the too early intake opening where you sink the valve (and/or go to steeper seat) cheers how many cuts on the chamber side?

jmflournoy
Автор

Still lovin and apreciate what you do.
Thank you for your efforts Eric. But the number of ads in this one are a little heavy. Atleast from my perspective. Anyway, Thanks. Great vid as usual. 👍

mohanperformance.enginerd.
Автор

Thank you for your knowledge and videos USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸 USA 🇺🇸

patrickwendling
Автор

If it's going to flow the same or can't be unshrouded in don't matter

jasoncarver
visit shbcf.ru