Mechanics of Materials: Lesson 14 - Poisson’s Ratio Example Problem, Using Strain

preview_player
Показать описание

Top 15 Items Every Engineering Student Should Have!

This video is NOT sponsored. Some product links are affiliate links which mean if you buy something we'll receive a small commission.

Please consider supporting the channel by subscribing, commenting, and liking each video. This moves these videos up the search list and helps me greatly. Thank you for watching.

This video is copyrighted by the Jeff Hanson for the private use of our audience. Any other use of this video or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the video without written consent from Jeff Hanson is strictly prohibited.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Dr Hanson, You are the best, #1 by far. Thanks! Hope you finished the dynamic and thermodynamic courses as well.

alivossoughian
Автор

Very very fascinating and extremely well communicated. Most surprising to me are that the location of the load (x) depends on the length of the column and that the change in diameter is proportional to the original diameter.
Thanks for such great content!

mef
Автор

Next series : Mechanics of machinery, heat transfer lets gooo !

bennyace
Автор

at 8:18, wouldn't the 80(x) be negative in the equation?

epicdarr
Автор

I got to the same result by using the value for modulus of elasticity earlier, computing both Fa and Fb as a function of the common deformation ΔL and then using equilibrium equation for the beam to solve for ΔL. Your solution was 10 times easier tho

billsamour
Автор

How come published real world data for metals never agree with the E, G, Poisson's Ratio relationship? It is not even close. For example:

1045 Steel
E = 200 GPa
G = 80 GPa
v = .29

If you were to calculated Poisson's Ratio from E and G, you would come up with .25, not .29.

I have checked many materials, and found the real world G vs E is not consistent with G = E/2*(1+v)

shootera
Автор

F column B is F column A, and the opposite is true. You mistook the result, because it's not logical the have a weak force on A then B, when 80KN is applied much close to A. So, FA would be 40.93KN and FB = 39.07kn. For this, the new diameter will be, 30.008316 mm

A.Hisham
Автор

How is there not a Ma on column A? I thought only pin connections didn’t have moments...

ViktoriaReads
Автор

At 11:40, dividing 39 000 by pi x 15^2 gives us 550 not 55 Mpa.

vladimirstamenov
Автор

I love your videos, but is 8 ads a video necessary?

darrensiegmeister
Автор

Sounds a lot like my…. Never mind doesn’t grow much, but it grows

JesusSavesRepent
Автор

Take It as a joke, Do we also have to remember the sound effects you make during the Poisson ratio, squeeze it the diameter

Alpha-gjpz