Proof: Cosets Partition the Group | Abstract Algebra

preview_player
Показать описание
We prove, for a group G with subgroup H, the family of cosets Ha as a ranges over G, forms a partition of G. This means any two cosets Ha and Hb will be disjoint or equal, and also that every element of G is in a coset Ha. This is a significant but easily proven result. #abstractalgebra #grouptheory

Abstract Algebra Exercises:

◉Textbooks I Like◉

★DONATE★

Thanks to Petar, dric, Rolf Waefler, Robert Rennie, Barbara Sharrock, Joshua Gray, Karl Kristiansen, Katy, Mohamad Nossier, and Shadow Master for their generous support on Patreon!

Follow Wrath of Math on...

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I like the way you copy and paste the prepared notes sections as you explain them. The technique seems surprisingly effective, allowing use to digest the concepts as you explain them instead of being rushed with too much information or having the listeners wait.

And the drawings are great.

Great content.

m.caeben
Автор

Hey don't be discouraged if you are not getting as many views as you'd liked because I'm sure that one day with this quality of content, you will surely grow! Keep attacking relentlessly at your goal and you will get there my guy :)

TheWildStatistician
Автор

Hello, just found your videos and I really appreciate them! Your explanation is clear and structured. Subscribed!

hoaang
Автор

Loved your explanation. Your language is very divine❤❤❤❤

sumittete
Автор

Hi !! Love your content, please keep it up. Especially your series on Graph Theory helped me a lot! Speaking of that, I would like to request a proof in Graph Theory as well : “every planar graph can be expressed as a union of five edge-disjoint forests”. Thanks!

SaiyaraLBS
Автор

Thank you very much! I love your videos. They really help me a lot. Can you please make disecrete math playlist with new videos and already existing vids by ascending difficulty.

ssh
Автор

Hi, I have a question. In the proof that every element of G is in some Ha, couldn't the statement ec=c∈Hc imply that e∈Ha for all a∈G ?
I mean, I'm convinced by the other video that e∈Ha for one single coset, but this last proof gave me that idea and now I'm a bit confused 🙁

golden_smaug
Автор

02:43 Why can't one just say that if x ∈ (Ha ∩ Hb) then x ∈ Ha and x ∈ Hb, and therefore Hx = Ha = Hb?

SimchaWaldman
Автор

Wouldn't this be also proving why the Quotient Group of H/G partitions G?

themariobros