Man still without his truck after city tree falls on it

preview_player
Показать описание
Man still without his truck after city tree falls on it
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If you have copies of written complaints of tree. Lawsuit. Or fall on the county sidewalk and sue for negligence of Public Safety. Good luck

robertneuzil
Автор

if the city determines if the tree was healthy then is the truck owners fault? then you better find away on how you can trip and hurt your self with that busted sidewalk. if you can't get them one way then try the other way...is funny how the city can say they own things. but don't like being responsible if shit happens with their shit

rosariosjunkremoval
Автор

What's up with his florescent green house

agentsmith
Автор

Comprehensive insurance on the truck should cover the damage. Let the insurance company go after the city.

lowercherty
Автор

Thanks tell the guy but in most jurisdictions I believe that tree is on his property that has an easement for the city, and the maintenance of it is his not the cities.
There's probably ordinances in place it require him to keep that sidewalk shoveled to keep the weeds clear of that area Etc it's his property his responsibilities.

rockymntnliberty
Автор

You lend him a similar car, fix hid car and pay him 100$/hour he has to spend dealing with this. Thats a minimum imo. And thats ASAP

fjalls
Автор

1:00 - The sidewalk is still jacked up...like the rest of the city.

lennytompkins
Автор

Wouldn't you just love to live next to or across from the dayglo green house? What a monstrousity!

dianeashworth
Автор

"Not a blue one, a big fat red one " 😂🤣

rogersmith
Автор

its not a healthy tree 0:49 clear evidence.

cf-xfku
Автор

Surely the tree belongs to the community not the City. In the UK that would be covered by the 3rd party car insurance. Then the insurance company may challenge the council.

richardchurch
Автор

Here in Minnesota it covers pretty much anything that happens when the car is parked and things that you had no control over while moving like a rock hitting your windshield or a deer hit. It also covers fire and theft. It definitely would cover a tree falling on a car. Unlike collision, rates don't go up because of a claim.

lowercherty
Автор

You have to know insurance restrictions. My daughter had a limb fall on the neighbors house. She is not responsible for any damage over the property line. The neighbors insurance would cover their own damage. Legally you cannot cut anything on their property, so the neighbor is responsible for cutting down any damaged limbs on their property.
By the way, damage was a trim panel, and they wanted a new roof.

robertheinkel
Автор

Whether the tree was healthy or not you can clearly see the tree was uprooted when it fell. The city should pay up

juliesajkar
Автор

You shouldn't have complained about the tree in the tree wouldn't have come down on you! God bless the beautiful trees!

deniecedonnafield
Автор

This would fall under "act of god" clause in the city's insurance and everybody's insurance for that matter. If it was dead its on the city but a live tree falling the owner of the truck should have comprehensive coverage and if not those parts are very cheap at a junkyard. Really think you can get money out of Detroit that's humorous.

repnatl
Автор

*A "D". A red one. Not a blue one, but a big red "D"* Sure hope you have been able to get your truck fixed, Charlie!!!

shannonsmith
Автор

Bull shit.fix the man's truck.i live in Michigan and bull shit is bull shit.pisses me off .dam that makes me mad.

dakotajones
Автор

Lawsuit. Hire a lawyer and sue the city of Detroit for negligence

JohnSmith-kfez
Автор

Bureaucrats get a check a do nothing

raycity