Neil DeGrasse Wants Evidence For God

preview_player
Показать описание
Edited by: @Reverted.Podcast

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I think I missed where he shows the evidence 🤔

m.g
Автор

Lmao i didint hear 1 evidence from hijab

Ayahu
Автор

There's a difference between evidence and arguments

montymonroe
Автор

He asked of "evidence" not "arguments".

NewGodzilla-
Автор

These people can collect their evidence from the graves soon enough

nurwadi
Автор

Source for this video: voices in my head

MarcosRVNeves
Автор

The problem here is that, scientists are open to the possibility of God being there. While people like this guy are not open to the possibility of God not being real. Therefore who is truly blind?

enlgn
Автор

He told you bring evidence not arguments. An argument is not evidence

randallfe
Автор

Scientific evidence is what Neil wants.

CosmicWhovian
Автор

Man really put Neil in quicksand when he said an RE GCSE level student has engaged in these arguments

Blaze
Автор

Evidence and arguments ARE. NOT. THE. SAME. THINGS.

deadweaselsteve
Автор

"There is in fact so much evidence for god, I can't even be bothered to provide a single example; It's much better to create an echo chamber of irrational zealots on YouTube" - This guy

lafudge
Автор

There is no evidence what so ever that any of the current 4000 gods exist. This is why its called faith. If you have evidence you don't need faith.

rmw
Автор

Thank you hijab for motivating me to learn theology and debate people from all religions

Hilal
Автор

I believe in the creator but I have to be objective. This video did not provide evidence

mattmay
Автор

he ask for for them yet dose not look for them.

شخص-حن
Автор

Lol people think this stupid guy said anything. An argument differs from EVIDENCE, an argument can and better be rejected ( specially when it comes to non sequitur fallacy, since none of those arguments directly lead to a god and certainly not yours, special tuning doesnt mean god exists and same goes for those other arguments). Now evidence is a different story since u shouldn’t neglect it nor there is a reason to neglect it, and it directly leads to one answer unlike an ARGUMENT

mdblaxy
Автор

He asked for evidence not argument 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

gp-
Автор

I think by evidence he means “physical evidence” or “scientific evidence”. 😂😂 Neil’s the man!!!

oscargamez
Автор

Arguments aren’t evidence. If its arguments it means it’s not been proven. It’s why you don’t find people arguing that water is black in colour.

fenrico