Black Scholes Explained - A Mathematical Breakdown

preview_player
Показать описание
This video breaks down the mathematics behind the Black Scholes options pricing formula.

The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities:

Excel Model

3b1b Normal Distribution Video

Note: Be sure to download the sheet in Excel, as not all formulas will populate in Google Drive.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks for the concise explanation. Very helpful and easier to understand than the one my professor gave.

Vail
Автор

Absolute magnificent. I have been wondering about how options work for years+! Thank you so much for the in-depth walkthrough!

holden
Автор

This channel is a hidden gem. Incredibly insightful, explained clearly and perfectly presented!

tarunmathew
Автор

I think your definition of the cumulative normal distribution from 5:26 on is missing a square. It should read N(d_i) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-inf}^{d_i} e^{-x^2/2} dx

SpamMaster-mkbt
Автор

notational pedantry: ln is usually used to represent the natural logarithm not the log normal

boriscrisp
Автор

what happened to e^1 at 4:12? are we not assuming t=1, so it would be K(e^1)N(d2)?

namirahasan-vbjm
Автор

Magnificinet explanation, it was super clear!

RosMyster
Автор

which tools are used for making such a good video?

cbe-commerce
Автор

Thanks, this was excellent coverage of Black-Scholes as-is👌

However, put-call parity is BS. This is largely because volatility doesn't have 50/50 correlation with upward/downward price movements (or in other words, it's not entitely independent of price movements). There is often an imbalance in put-option pricing which depends upon the market environment and the expectations of market participants.

davidaloha
Автор

That a beautiful explanation. I was able to reconstruct all the parts and to test it and it works beautifully. However one part didn't work. On 8:20 you are saying that if time to expiration is very short delta is either 1 for itm or 0 for otm. I changed T to 0.0001 and moved the strike above and below the spot and the sheet returned a 0 for both d1 and ď2 and 0.5 for nd1 and nd2. I was hoping to see 1 and 0. Maybe google sheet can't handle these small values.

zzprod
Автор

3:34 what’s your justification for reducing d2 to d1?

waynelast
Автор

Ln is the natural logarithm an ln(1)=0.
You mix things a little first saying it is the « lognormal » function. Lognormal is typically a kind of distribution where if X is normal then ln(X) is lognormal. Moreover you make a common confusion between ln et log. Log(x)=ln(x/10), thus log(10)=1

Kraktur
visit shbcf.ru