NASA Artemis teams finally realized that SpaceX is outclassing NASA after visiting Starbase

preview_player
Показать описание
NASA Artemis teams finally realized that SpaceX is outclassing NASA after visiting Starbase
Huge thanks to:
======
Nasa Artemis was a creation under the Trump administration, but it was one of the few programs that survived the transition of power. In 2021, Biden’s NASA selected SpaceX to develop the company’s next-generation rocket, called Starship, as a lunar lander for Artemis.
The agency awarded the company 2.941.394.557 USD billion to turn Starship into a vehicle that can transport humans to and from the lunar surface.
After more than a year of awarding the contract, up to this point, the agency fully believes in its right decision.
More importantly, after 2 times visiting Starbase, NASA Artemis teams officially confirmed that SpaceX is outclassing NASA in all aspects.
Why can SpaceX do this paradoxical thing?
Let’s find out in today’s episode of the Alpha tech channel:

First impressions of SpaceX's state-of-the-art infrastructure spotted on its first visit late last year:

"NASA recently visited SpaceX for a firsthand look at a prototype of the human lander that will ferry NASA Artemis astronauts to the lunar surface during Artemis III. This demonstration will lay the foundation for a long-term human presence at the Moon later this decade," the agency announced via Twitter on December 21st.

Talking about the Starbase Launch Site, Canadian Space Agency astronaut and pilot Joshua Kutryk shared an aerial photograph of the Starbase launch site.
At the start of 2021, Starbase’s lone orbital launch site was effectively a dirt lot and a fraction of the launch mount – the latter constructed well in advance of the rest of the pad. Less than a year later, a dramatic change is looming. That orbital launch site – including a skyscraper-sized launch tower, three massive arms, perhaps the most complex launch mount in spaceflight history, and the largest cryogenic tank farm ever built for a rocket – is on the verge of completion.

This certainly got the Artemis team thinking about how NASA spent a decade and almost $1 billion on a single launch tower.
Not to mention the present time, SpaceX has continued to complete the second launch tower in Florida. In contrast, NASA’s second mobile launcher is too heavy, years late, and pushing $1 billion
What a huge difference!

On the same day, Canadian Space Agency astronaut and pilot Joshua Kutryk shared an aerial photograph of the Starbase launch site: "Flying in the skies above Boca Chica this morning with NASA Astronaut Jasmin Moghbeli, dreaming of a future when ships full of humans may leave from this beach for Mars. (Look closely and you can see a Starship)," he wrote in a Tweet.

NASA Astronaut Victor Glover, who flew aboard SpaceX’s Crew-1 mission to the International Space Station, is also an Artemis astronaut. He visited the Starbase rocket factory as well.
It was truly a speechless moment!
NASA Artemis teams finally realized that SpaceX is outclassing NASA after visiting Starbase
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Bigger is better, re-usability is the key to affordable space exploration and the goal of colonisation of the Solar System is the logical first step to becoming a 'type one' civilisation on the Kardashev scale...
I'm in awe of SpaceX and Elon Musk. Naming his car company after Nicholai Tesla was a classy move too. The guy doesn't exactly need an ego boost, but I wish you and all your companies every success in the future Mr. Musk, thank you for dragging our manned space programme out of the 60's and for making the shared future of humanity so much brighter. 🌞

SteveWalkey
Автор

Great video. Love the detail and astonished looks on NASA Engineers and Officials. 🙂

sammoyers
Автор

The speed at which SpaceX can take their concepts to actual hardware is really impressive so is their willingness to rapidly evolve existing designs.

schrodingerscat
Автор

It's a lot easier to take something from design to product when you are 3D printing a lot of it . It took us 2 years to develop the hybrid motor that Scaled Composite used to win the X-prize and that is a very simple motor by comparison . Testing took a lot of the time during that development phase, actual manufacturing time was less than 10% of the time while testing was probably at least 50% if you include all that goes into testing and the rest was design time and dealing with red tape .

stevej
Автор

OMG man i really love your channel, the details, the quality of informations, everything, !
this channel is added to my favourite spacex channels beside marcus house, what about it and the everyday astronaut !

yassirbourhail
Автор

They’re thinking if SpaceXis doing this well with Starship maybe Falcon Heavy is better than SLS

murrayzichlinsky
Автор

Sls is rated at max 4 people. Embarrassing

recycle
Автор

What the NASA folks r thinking is the whole their Kafkaesque life of toeing the agency line is just going to get harder going forward

christophernolan
Автор

Nasa engineers are thinking: I need to go work for SpaceX...

stratcat
Автор

Design it, build it, test it, break it. Every time something gets built the whole world advances. M. Peaty

Rincypoopoo
Автор

5:57 I counted *33*, not *39*, Raptors installed in the clip shown.

Pixelsplasher
Автор

The NASA model of doing business is too bureaucratic, and spends too much time figuring out how to justify getting more money with no real concequences for waste and a lack of urgency. Space X is a business.

daviddesrosiers
Автор

Take 1 standard Starship, 1 HLS, and rendezvous in Lunar orbit
That should do the job - without NASA.

liammeech
Автор

You might want to check me. But SLS started with Obama. This was going to goto Mars. Trump then changed it for the moon.

jphgaming