AMD Fluid Motion Frame (Frame Generation) on RX 6000 Series - Test in 8 Games

preview_player
Показать описание
AMD Fluid Motion Frames : ON vs OFF (RX 6750 XT) | 1440p

Use coupon code and get discount - TG3

Ad - 0:00
Games :
Assassin's Creed Mirage - 0:06
Starfield - 3:02
The Last of Us Part I - 4:02

System:
Windows 11
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Games :
Assassin's Creed Mirage - 0:06
Starfield - 3:02
The Last of Us Part I - 4:02


System:
Windows 11

TestingGames
Автор

Honestly, turning on AFMF has little effect on the smoothness of the picture if fps is below 60, although AMD's built-in overlay says fps is above 80

TestingGames
Автор

Wow with this tech, now you can even turn on RT. Your Red Dead run was using the Vulcan API and maybe thats why there was no difference in fps...

Nite-Lite-Gamers
Автор

At 6:10 it makes no difference in Red Dead because it's running on Vulkan, while currently AFMF only supports Direct X11 and Direct X12.

wolfclaw
Автор

It's a shame you can.t cap the FPS with fluid frames instead it seems to run uncapped. If you could have a locked 60 FPS from 40 that would lessen out the screen tearing

exoticspeedefy
Автор

Now with the official Driver Update I can refer to your tests.

In every games I tested with the 6750XT, I could halfe the input latency (surprised, thought It will be much higher) and Iam able to double FPS in 2k and also be able to play at 4k. Suddenly my 6750XT turned into a high-end GPU. I can't see any difference in the quality.. maybe if I make Screenshots, but not in real action.

One strange exception: Crysis 2. No matter which resolution or graphic settings I use, I reach around 60 FPS. With activated Fluid Motion around 80 FPS. But nothing feels smooth. Rly strange in this game

NPPusch
Автор

Is afmf available for rtx 4000 series cards? I also have a ryzen 7 7700x if that helps

turkeyman
Автор

Any ideia of when its gona come to rx 6000m?

Ralaminotabas
Автор

hows the performance improvement on those games which gets 60 to 70 fps natively ???

purnenduray
Автор

What kind of program is this for measuring FPS? FPS Monitor?

HiTekSamurai
Автор

Does anybody know when this is released?

Ladioz
Автор

This fps increase function does not work, other monitoring will show a different value, and AMD monitoring does not show it correctly. On the 6900xt I was convinced that this function did not work.

Серёга-нм
Автор

I tried AC Origins and i'm getting worse performance in the benchmark.Even just sitting in the main menu i can see the frame rate tanking with it On.I have a 6900XT and a 5900X.Wth is this?Am'i doing something wrong?

Greglaz
Автор

i cant find fluid motion frame option in my adrenalin app

petermolnar
Автор

how to record amd performance overlay???

every i start screen record amd performance overlay wont show/ record

alvialif
Автор

Red dead redemption always ignores the power of video cards, the amount of memory, and technology. It's always like a random fps

darxide
Автор

How does it feel while playing an FPS Game? Is it laggy, is there latency? Worth it buying AMD 7900xtx for it or do u recommend a 4080 / 4090 instead of that feature?

Does it work well on a 6800xt /7800xt? :)

Denniz
Автор

AMD says the frame time is fine and those jittery graphs are supposed to look like that but I don't think the frame pacing is great with AFMF enabled. Starfield becomes much more nauseating to me with it on.

jumpman
Автор

My 6700xt doesn't like afmf, if my fps is below 60, like 45, once I enable afmf fps goes to ~80. But it looks awful, input lag isn't bad, but it just looks soo bad, that even 45fps on their own look better than with afmf. If the fps is above 60, I can't see a difference.

brzimtrco
Автор

Stop using that potato game Starfield for test. It looks like a game from 2000 and still isn't optimized as if it's giving us some next gen revelation.

SneharthoDey