A-Level Maths: H5-12 Further Integration: Introducing Integration by Substitution

preview_player
Показать описание


Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Just wanna say that you are honestly getting me through A level Maths. Thanks so much!!!

gordonwoods
Автор

I've noticed that some of the greatest Maths lessons (masterpieces of creating clarity and order from a confusing sea of detail) on YouTube often predict those little puzzlements that arise in your head (puzzlements that can be vital links in the chain of your understanding) and TL did that for me in this lesson.
That is, it occurred to me to ask myself HOW do you know WHEN to use the Integration by Substitution Rule?. I just couldn't think of what it was, by myself.
But then TL told us in this lesson how it's often appropriate to use it when you get something like (2x + 1)^5., which would take ages to integrate without the Integration by Substitution Rule. So helpful to know that.

helenday
Автор

This is explained really well sir good job.

GCSEALevelMaths
Автор

anyone else think his voice is so relaxing

jacksonsmith
Автор

As I struggle sometimes with reversing the chain rule Is it worth just always doing integration by substitution as I find it a lot easier? Also very dumb question but what does the dx actually mean and when you do the integral of (2x+1)^5 dx, what are you actually doing? Is (2x+1)^5 dx the derivative?

charliebrett
Автор

thankyou so much you are so cool and such a good teacher

lukeh
Автор

Could you just use pascals triangle to expand the (2x+1)^5 and then once you have done with that integrate it using ax^n+1/n+1 or would that method not work

LeeLarner
Автор

hi mr jack i'm sorry but could you solve my problem? (A+B) = 5π/6 sinAcosB= 1/3 find cot (A-B)

ninanakagawa
Автор

Hi Jack, thank you again for the vid. I just wanted to ask this question if I may. It may or may not be a common question, is u sub ALWAYS reversing the chain rule?

In the example you did, we could see the reverse rules there. But the the thing I want to get clear on, is that basically, I have found integrals I cannot reverse the chain rule, but somehow a u sub seems to solve it.

Like consider this one:

Integrand: 3x(x-4)^4... I could not see how chain rule could be reversed, but put, u=x-4 and crank the handle, VOILA... how does that work?

So just a bit confused whether it does reverse the chain rule in ways I dont know about or something else?

AceOfHearts
Автор

Sth that my teacher taught for 2h and I still struggled, he taught me in 6 minutes if that’s not talent then what is it ?

amirbatayi
Автор

Why did du disappear after you have integrated ?

destined
Автор

Hi. I was doing a question where I had to integrate sqaure root of x squared + 4 and that over x. Initially I made the u as x squared +4 as that was the function inside the square root however u cannot do the question like that as u was meant to be square root of x squared + 4. I was gonna to ask is there a definite way of knowing what to make u? Or do you have to trial and error? Also I heard that for a level maths majority of the time u is given unless the question is easy, is that true ?

blazethe
Автор

Do you have videos where you teach mechanics AQA instead of past papers? If you don’t do you have any other links you know that do mechanics 1 A Level AQA

youtuberue
Автор

The reverse chain rule gets you 12(2x+1)^6 whereas subs gets you 1/12(2x+1)^6, sm1 pls explain, or why does it get put into 1/12 at minute 1.55

avoriginal
Автор

I can see what you do with the du/dx and how you substitute out the dx replacing it with 0.5du which you then use to multiply u^5 by 0.5, but I don't really understand why this can be done and how it works. I don't really understand what the dx at the end of every integral means and what the du at the end of this integral means. I assume it means (integrating) with respect to x or u, but I don't understand how you can have a half du, then multiply everything by a half and now you integrate properly? Maybe this is all unnecessary and I should just accept the rule.

victory
Автор

How do you know when to use integration by parts or integration by sub?

syedabbas
Автор

Why can you just use the derivative like a fraction?

CrunchiestGranola