Why T-14 Armata Tank can not be sent to Ukraine #tank

Why Russian T-14 Armata Tank can not be sent to Ukraine

[subcio]

The 14 in t14 stands for number of operational tanks XD

[Pantsir-SM]

Why American is not sent Abram tank to Ukraine?

[NoName-mdzb]

Armata is so stealthy, you just cant see it !

[karlerik]

I think “advanced” is not the right word I think outdated is the right one😢

[ikirik]

Because the production of these tanks has not been established, unlike various modifications of the T-90 / T-72! This means that it will take a lot of time and a lot of money to produce one unit! The Russians first sell their tanks abroad, reduce the cost of production of these vehicles at times, and then deliver them to their troops! An export passport has been made, but there are no buyers yet! Therefore, they were produced in a limited number of 30 units, and before the war!

Well, and whoever thinks that the tank is made of corton or something like that, then the Russians back in the USSR were developing ready-made prototypes like object-195 or object 477!

[mtaylor]

I believe they had 6 of them in the May Day parade and one of them had to be towed away. LOL!!! Russian technology!!!

[КоржикКоржиков-мщ]

Так смешно читать "диванных экспертов" в коментариях, они асё знают о т14, при этом ни одна страна кроме России, не имеет даже 1 танк 3 поколения. 😂😂😂😂

[JohnnyL]

Because they have 20 of those and cant produce more.

[kentriat]

It’s for the same reason the USA is not even sending a first version of. M1A2 to Ukraine but building old M1A1 dumbed down thermal and combat system because they don’t want to see more destroyed

The USA is trying hard to hide that Saudi Arabia has had over 30 M1A2 Sep 4 + tanks destroyed in Yemen. These were top of the line tanks with crews trained in the USA for 12 months.

Even the UK has restricted the use of the 12 Challenger tanks they have supplied. Germany has dumbed down the Leopard 2 ver 6 it has supplied putting in old combat and communication equipment.

[vyhkwxw]

Thus tank is probably the only one they have available for parades and events can’t be spared

[doogustrog]

T-14 is just as far developed as the T-100 but made it to parades. Change my mind

[DonBrown-lvzc]

Russia just playing with ukrain letting NATO deplete there ammo. but NATO so dum they don't see it

[JB-nfrc]

First off, they did get sent, and if you apply this logic to any war, then no one would ever send anything new to war and everyone would still be using sticks and stones.

[ampaphanwaters]

Because they can use T90 T80 or ... instead of T14. Also it costs more than T90 T80 or ... Drone also works well!

[thespotsloggan]

i can guarantee you that the t-14 armata doesnt have anything the western world doesnt know about

[razdva]

Это самое наиглупейшее определение Арматы, которое только может быть. Арматы нет не СВО не потому, что ее могут уничтожить или даже затрофеить, не потому, что Россия якобы боится. Разуйте глаза и посмотрите, на чем воюет ВСУ. Это просто смешно, отправлять танк, разработанный в 14 году на убой воевать с танками 60-80 годов. Жаль, что этого понимают единицы.

[uweschmidt]

Cannot be used in Ukraine, the service card for the towing service has expired. Putinnocchio didn't pay on time.

[jamiehobson]

The T-14 has had its funding stripped since the war as they could no longer afford putting money into the development of the tank ;)

[homuneko]

There are like 10-20 combat ready t-14 and they are much more effective as command and support vehicles then as battle tanks like t-90

[heisnotlongbutthin]

No YOU ARE WRONG, i am pretty sure the T-14 is actually the only tank with a none flying turrent. It´s gona be an embarresment if we find out.