Nietzsche's Perspective: Why Arguing is for Weak

"Have you ever imagined a world where arguing is seen as a sign of weakness, not strength? A world where the ability to argue is frowned upon, not admired?" These provocative ideas are not just mere musings, but the philosophical outlook of one Friedrich Nietzsche, a name that has resonated through the corridors of intellectual debate for more than a century. Born in the mid-nineteenth century, Nietzsche was a German philosopher who dared to challenge the status quo, to question the unquestionable. His views on morality, religion, and culture were as controversial as they were influential, often pushing against the grain of societal norms. His unconventional perspective on arguing, in particular, may seem counterintuitive in our debate-driven society. But to truly understand Nietzsche's standpoint, we must first plunge into the depths of his philosophical background. Let's delve into the mind of Friedrich Nietzsche and try to understand his unconventional perspective.

[Zitterkarl]

How I understood his readings he didn't thought that morality and truth are inseperable and that there is a Universal moral! In "Beyond good and evil" he questioned morality itself as a Construct and came to the conclusion that Morality is more a tool or an expression of our values rather than being something "true" or objective.